Recent

Check Out Our Forum Tab!

Click On The "Forum" Tab Under The Logo For More Content!
If you are using your phone, click on the menu, then select forum. Make sure you refresh the page!
The views of the poster, may not be the views of the website of "Minnesota Outdoorsman" therefore we are not liable for what our members post, they are solely responsible for what they post. They agreed to a user agreement when signing up to MNO.

Author Topic: 10 wolf killed/boost Elk  (Read 3104 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lee Borgersen

  • AKA "Smallmouthguide"
  • Pro-Staff
  • Master Outdoorsman
  • *
  • Posts: 15328
  • Karma: +40/-562
  • 2008-2011-2018-2019 2020 Fish Challenge Champ!
    • Lee's Lake Geneva Guide Service
  Wildlife officials: 10 wolves killed in northern Idaho to boost elk numbers!

March 19, 2018

 :reporter; Associated Press

 :coffee: .....
BOISE, Idaho — Federal officials have killed 10 wolves in northern Idaho at the request of the Idaho Department of Fish and Game to boost elk numbers, and state officials say more might be killed this winter.

 :police: ....
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Wildlife Services said that workers used a helicopter in the Clearwater National Forest in late February and early March to kill the wolves.
“At the request of Idaho, we did remove wolves in that region,” said agency spokeswoman Tanya Espinosa.
Idaho officials say the area’s elk population in what’s called the Lolo zone has plummeted in the last 25 years from about 16,000 to about 2,000, and that wolves are to blame along with black bears, mountain lions and a habitat transition to more forests.

 :fudd:
Fish and Game has liberal harvest rules for bears and mountain lions, but wolves are more challenging to hunt. So in six of the last seven years, Fish and Game has sought to kill wolves to boost elk. Elk are a prominent big game species in Idaho and hunters have decried a scarcity of elk in the region. Elk are also a source of revenue through hunting license sales for Fish and Game.
“We’ve made an obligation to try to manage this elk herd at levels at maybe not peak levels, but at least bring it back to levels that we’ve seen in the past that were adequate for hunting,” said Jim Hayden, a biologist with Fish and Game.

 :popcorn: ..
Officials say Fish and Game license dollars paid for the federal agency to kill the wolves. State and federal officials didn’t have the cost immediately available.
Environmental groups blasted the killing of the wolves, focusing on the operation being made public only after it happened.

“Now more than ever, Wildlife Services and the Idaho Department of Fish and Game need to be up-front with the public about their plans to kill wolves,” said Andrea Santarsiere, an attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity. “Idaho stopped monitoring wolves last year and stopped releasing annual reports revealing how many wolves remain in Idaho. It’s troubling to see this ever-increasing veil of secrecy fall over the management of Idaho’s wolves.”

The last intensive wolf count in Idaho was in 2015 when officials said the state had an estimated 786 wolves at the end of the year. That’s also the last year Fish and Game was required to do that type of count after wolves were removed from the Endangered Species List.


But Fish and Game has continued to monitor wolf populations. Hayden said that based on DNA samples from more than 700 wolf droppings, nearly 150 remote cameras and other information, at least 11 packs are in the Lolo zone. Hayden said the agency manages populations and doesn’t count individuals. But he said an Idaho wolf pack typically has six to nine wolves. That means there are roughly 65 to 100 wolves in the Lolo zone.

Fish and Game estimates that statewide there are more than 90 packs, Hayden said, far above the state’s minimum requirement of 15 packs. :doah: The federal government could take back management of Idaho wolves if the population gets too low.

Hayden said the state and federal agencies do not announce wolf-kill operations out of concern for the safety of the helicopter crew as well as the last-minute nature of the operations. He said a snowy day must be followed by clear flying weather, and there’s a chance that if those conditions occur again this winter federal workers will try to kill more wolves in the Lolo zone.
“After you go after the first one, the wolves are scattering, so it’s not common to take a whole pack,” he said.
« Last Edit: March 03/21/18, 11:01:58 AM by Lee Borgersen »
Proud Member of the CWCS.
http://www.cwcs.org

Member of Walleyes For Tomorrow.
www.walleyesfortomorrow.org

              Many BWCA Reports
http://leeslakegenevaguideservice.com/boundry_%2712.htm

If you help someone when they're in trouble, they will remember you when they're in trouble again

Online LPS

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 23976
  • Karma: +70/-14
Good job.  Maybe the MN DNR will learn from this operation.

Offline markn

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 1989
  • Karma: +4/-0
 Heard this on the tube last night. Too many moose I guess.


MINNEAPOLIS (WCCO) — The National Park Service wants to put 20 to 30 wolves on a remote island off Minnesota’s north shore.

It says they’re needed to bolster the nearly extinct population on Isle Royale.

The reintroduction could happen as soon as this fall, depending on funding and finding the wolves.

Supporters say the move would help preserve the island’s ecosystem and reduce the large moose population on the island.
mm

Offline Rebel SS

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 26405
  • Karma: +185/-50
  • "Seems like time is here and gone".....Doobie's
And I thought the moose population was so far down here?  :scratch:

Online LPS

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 23976
  • Karma: +70/-14
To many mooses on Isle Royale they say. 

Offline Jerkbiat

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 10036
  • Karma: +26/-188
The dummies will put wolves on the island and then there will be to many wolves and no moose left. Why do't they just hunt enough to control the population. That would make more sense to me.
Hey look your bobber is up!

Offline Rebel SS

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 26405
  • Karma: +185/-50
  • "Seems like time is here and gone".....Doobie's
The dummies will put wolves on the island and then there will be to many wolves and no moose left. Why do't they just hunt enough to control the population. That would make more sense to me.

X2     Cheaper, too. What's it cost to get those wolves together and transport them to that area?
« Last Edit: March 03/22/18, 06:43:06 AM by Rebel SS »

Online glenn57

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 45116
  • Karma: +207/-191
  • 2015 deer contest champ!!!
why dont they capture some of them moose and move them to the mainland.............like in minnesota!!!!! sheez how hard is that to figure out!!!!! :doofus: :doofus: since the population here is low!!!!!!
2015 deer slayer!!!!!!!!!!

Online Leech~~

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 3257
  • Karma: +25/-133
Well, if those stupid Elk would get brain worm like MN Moose and kill themselves, they wouldn't have to kill all those poor Wolves!  :pouty:  :bs: :bs: :bs: :bs:


"The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Wildlife Services said that workers used a helicopter in the Clearwater National Forest in late February and early March to kill the wolves.
“At the request of Idaho, we did remove wolves in that region,” said agency spokeswoman Tanya Espinosa.
Idaho officials say the area’s elk population in what’s called the Lolo zone has plummeted in the last 25 years from about 16,000 to about 2,000, and that wolves are to blame along with black bears, mountain lions and a habitat transition to more forests."
Cooking over a open fire is all fun and games until someone losses a wiener!

Offline delcecchi

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 3693
  • Karma: +19/-374
The dummies will put wolves on the island and then there will be to many wolves and no moose left. Why do't they just hunt enough to control the population. That would make more sense to me.

Isle Royal is a national park and has had wolves and moose for many years.   But a bout of disease followed by too much inbreeding basically wiped out the wolves so the moose are overpopulating.   

They argued for a while and apparently decided that restocking the wolves was the best alternative.

Just google "wolves of isle royale".   There are books about it going back to the 60's 

Online Steve-o

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 6670
  • Karma: +17/-10
I'd be curious to know how often Superior freezes over so wolves can get across and then find out if - during all that time they were studying - if any new wolves made the journey.

Offline mike89

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 25150
  • Karma: +57/-11
I think it has froze over and they did migrate once... 
a bad day of fishing is still better than a good day at work!!

Online glenn57

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 45116
  • Karma: +207/-191
  • 2015 deer contest champ!!!
The dummies will put wolves on the island and then there will be to many wolves and no moose left. Why do't they just hunt enough to control the population. That would make more sense to me.

Isle Royal is a national park and has had wolves and moose for many years.   But a bout of disease followed by too much inbreeding basically wiped out the wolves so the moose are overpopulating.   

They argued for a while and apparently decided that restocking the wolves was the best alternative.

Just google "wolves of isle royale".   There are books about it going back to the 60's
:doofus: :doofus: :confused: so instead of moving some of these moose to places that have super low moose populations, they decide to bring more wolves there to kill them??????? :censored: :scratch: :doah: now i'm not a wolf hater but i see no reason they cant do a little bit of both. UGH!!!!! :crazy: :crazy:
2015 deer slayer!!!!!!!!!!

Offline delcecchi

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 3693
  • Karma: +19/-374

[/quote] :doofus: :doofus: :confused: so instead of moving some of these moose to places that have super low moose populations, they decide to bring more wolves there to kill them??????? :censored: :scratch: :doah: now i'm not a wolf hater but i see no reason they cant do a little bit of both. UGH!!!!! :crazy: :crazy:
[/quote]

Move a few moose off the island, next year need to do it again.   Bring back a wolf population, things will be (supposedly) stable and balanced for a long time.   

You just want some moose backstraps to marinade in catsup and make into jerky.   

And Isle Royale is in Michigan, so you would be be a non-resident.   So wouldn't get to hunt there anyway.