Minnesota Outdoorsman - Minnesota Fishing and Hunting Reports
 

Recent


Author Topic: Judge tosses case against.....  (Read 763 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lee Borgersen

  • AKA "Smallmouthguide"
  • Pro-Staff
  • Master Outdoorsman
  • *
  • Posts: 13099
  • Karma: +32/-59
  • 2008-2011 & 2018 MNO Fishing Challenge Champ!
    • Lee's Lake Geneva Guide Service
  • Liked: 108
  • Likes Given: 35
Judge tosses case against.....
« on: October 10, 2018, 09:05:51 AM »
:coffee: Judge tosses case against pipeline valve turners. :banghead:

10/10/18

 :popcorn: ...
BAGLEY -- The environmental movement chose a small Minnesota town as the battleground for its latest fight.

A judge in Clearwater County dismissed the case :bonk: Tuesday against three people who were charged with damaging a pipeline in 2016. And while they have made their point, they all traveled a long way to do it. Among the seven people sitting in front of the judge, only two were from Minnesota, and only one was from Clearwater County.   


The defendants, who have referred to themselves as “valve turners,”  :crazy: shut off the valves of two Enbridge Energy Co. pipelines near Leonard, Minn., in October 2016 as a way to protest the oil industry’s contribution to climate change. :taz: The action was part of a coordinated effort across several states almost two years to the day of Tuesday’s court hearing.

In Clearwater County, Emily Johnston, of Seattle, was charged with causing property damage to a pipeline. Both Annette Klapstein, of Bainbridge Island, Wash., and Benjamin Joldersma, of Seattle, had been charged with aiding the property damage of a pipeline.

“We are obviously relieved that the criminal charges have now been dismissed, but there is a lot of work to do with regard to climate change and the underlying issues,” said Lauren Regan, one of the three defense attorneys in the case.

Like the defendants, their legal team traveled thousands of miles to fight the battle in the small northwoods town. Regan works with the Civil Liberties Defense Center in Eugene, Ore. The team also consisted of Kelsey Skaggs from the Climate Defense Project in San Francisco and Twin-Cities based attorney Timothy Phillips.

But Tuesday’s dismissal did not garner unanimous approval from those watching from afar. :moon:

"Today's decision is irresponsible, and sends the message that protesters are free to engage in reckless, illegal, and dangerous behavior that puts Minnesotans' safety at risk,” said state Rep. Pat Garofalo, R-Farmington, who chairs the House Job Growth and Energy Affordability Committee. “Protesters have already shut down freeways, closed airports and stopped trains.  Now they are going after our energy infrastructure. This is a very dangerous action that needs to be corrected in the next legislative session."

The judge, Robert Tiffany, dismissed the case at the defense attorneys’ request midway through the second day of trial after County Attorney Alan Rogalla rested his case.

Tiffany granted the dismissal based on arguments from the defense attorneys, one of which was that the prosecution failed to prove the defendants had damaged the actual pipeline rather than merely the chains and locks bound to the pipeline valve.  :doah: what about trespassing :doah:

Once the decision was announced, applause and celebration broke out in the courtroom, which had extra seating to accommodate the crowd. All told, there were approximately 65 people in the audience of the small courtroom, according to the courthouse staff.   

Tuesday started with the seating of 12 jurors and two alternates who had been selected after a full day of deliberation Monday. During that process, many of the potential jurors had provided mixed opinions on the validity of climate change.

The prosecution then brought forth both Clearwater County Sheriff Darin Halverson as well as Enbridge supervisor Bill Palmer to testify. Under cross-examination, Palmer testified that simply shutting off the valve would not have caused any damage to the pipeline.

It did, however, cause significant loss of production for the company, which was essentially the intent of the valve turners. Palmer testified that each of the two pipes the defendants turned off was capable of transporting as many as 33,000 gallons of oil an hour. Since the company had to shut down the pipelines for eight hours following the incident, the valve turners effectively delayed the transportation of more than half a million gallons of oil.

Rogalla also showed a video the defendants filmed the day of the incident. It showed the defendants approach the valve site and then call an Enbridge representative on the phone to explain what they had done and why they did it.

“For the sake of climate justice and to ensure the future for human civilization, we must immediately halt the extraction (and) burning of Canadian tar sands,” defendant Joldersma could be heard saying on the video while on the phone with Enbridge.

The defense requested to have the case dismissed before it ever brought forth any of its own witnesses, even though Regan said her clients wanted to testify.

The defense also intended to invoke the “necessity defense,” which would have allowed them to claim they performed the crime as a way to prevent greater harm. Since the judge dismissed the charges early, the defendants did not get to use the defense they had planned.

“I also admit that I am disappointed that we did not get to put on the trial that we hoped for,” Johnston said.   

In October 2017, Tiffany ruled the defendants could use the necessity defense, but prosecutors appealed that decision all the way to the Minnesota Supreme Court, which declined to hear the case. By doing so, the high court essentially backed the Minnesota Court of Appeals, which had sided with the defendants.

Requesting the dismissal also may have been an early exit strategy for the defense since it had sustained a blow earlier in the day. Tiffany ruled the defense’s expert witnesses could not testify on the effects of climate change, explaining it could prejudice the jury.

In addition to the three defendants in Clearwater County, there was an activist from at least one of the other valve turner trials who came to court Tuesday. Michael Foster spent time in prison for his part in a similar event in North Dakota.

The valve turners have been at least somewhat successful in communicating their core message in the two years since they carried out their plan against pipelines. In February, the New York Times Magazine published a 6,400-word story on the environmental activists who were involved in the coordinated act of civil disobedience, including both Johnston and Klapstein. A writer from Wired Magazine was on hand for Tuesday’s proceedings.

The defendants and their legal team fielded questions on the courthouse steps shortly after the judge made his announcement.

Joldersma stood with his 8-year-old daughter, indicating it was partly for her generation that he helped take part in the valve turner activism.   

Klapstein said the time frame in which climate change can be reversed is continuing to narrow and they will continue to work toward mitigating its effects.

“We did this two years ago, and things have only got massively worse since then,” Klapstein said. “Would I rule out civil disobedience again? Absolutely not.”
Proud Member of the CWCS.
http://www.cwcs.org

Member of Walleyes For Tomorrow.
www.walleyesfortomorrow.org

              2012 BWCA Report
http://leeslakegenevaguideservice.com/boundry_%2712.htm

If you help someone when they're in trouble, they will remember you when they're in trouble again.

Offline Steve-o

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 942
  • Karma: +9/-4
  • Liked: 170
  • Likes Given: 16
Re: Judge tosses case against.....
« Reply #1 on: October 10, 2018, 09:13:18 AM »
How about we go and turn off the valve to the natural gas pipe flowing into their homes.

Offline Jerkbiat

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 1620
  • Karma: +16/-2
  • Liked: 104
  • Likes Given: 226
Re: Judge tosses case against.....
« Reply #2 on: October 10, 2018, 09:26:20 AM »
 :happy1: :happy1: :happy1: What Steve said.
Hey look your bobber is up!

Offline glenn57

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 15416
  • Karma: +105/-150
  • 2015 deer contest champ!!!
  • Liked: 339
  • Likes Given: 325
Re: Judge tosses case against.....
« Reply #3 on: October 10, 2018, 09:34:49 AM »
:happy1: :happy1: :happy1: What Steve said.
double that thought!!!!! no gas for there car to drive here to protest. :happy1:
2015 deer slayer!!!!!!!!!!

Offline mike89

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 6968
  • Karma: +39/-7
  • Liked: 222
  • Likes Given: 358
Re: Judge tosses case against.....
« Reply #4 on: October 10, 2018, 10:24:22 AM »
or their other toys that use gas too!!!! :happy1: :happy1:

I like the idea!!
a bad day of fishing is still better than a good day at work!!

Offline deadeye

  • MNO Moderator
  • Master Outdoorsman
  • *
  • Posts: 3855
  • Karma: +16/-1
  • Liked: 236
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Judge tosses case against.....
« Reply #5 on: October 10, 2018, 10:33:21 AM »
I wonder how they got here, walked?

“We did this two years ago, and things have only got massively worse since then,” Klapstein said.

Maybe time to look for a different plan. 
***I started out with nothing, and I still have most of it.***

Offline Leech~~

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 719
  • Karma: +15/-9
  • Liked: 102
  • Likes Given: 409
Re: Judge tosses case against.....
« Reply #6 on: October 10, 2018, 11:18:01 AM »

Well at least North Dakota still has some Balls! It's the difference between our pussy libber Blue state and a  law up holding Red state!  :coffee:

"Michael Foster spent time in prison for his part in a similar event in North Dakota".
Cooking over a open fire is all fun and games until someone losses a wiener!

Offline glenn57

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 15416
  • Karma: +105/-150
  • 2015 deer contest champ!!!
  • Liked: 339
  • Likes Given: 325
Re: Judge tosses case against.....
« Reply #7 on: October 10, 2018, 11:47:39 AM »

Well at least North Dakota still has some Balls! It's the difference between our pussy libber Blue state and a  law up holding Red state!  :coffee:

"Michael Foster spent time in prison for his part in a similar event in North Dakota".
uh, yea ok D2E!!! :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :moon: J/K!!
2015 deer slayer!!!!!!!!!!

Offline Leech~~

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 719
  • Karma: +15/-9
  • Liked: 102
  • Likes Given: 409
Re: Judge tosses case against.....
« Reply #8 on: October 10, 2018, 12:24:00 PM »

Well at least North Dakota still has some Balls! It's the difference between our pussy libber Blue state and a  law up holding Red state!  :coffee:

"Michael Foster spent time in prison for his part in a similar event in North Dakota".
uh, yea ok D2E!!! :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :moon: J/K!!

I know someone with true Blue balls would chime in!  Morning glenn.  :moon:  :rotflmao:
Cooking over a open fire is all fun and games until someone losses a wiener!

Offline glenn57

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 15416
  • Karma: +105/-150
  • 2015 deer contest champ!!!
  • Liked: 339
  • Likes Given: 325
Re: Judge tosses case against.....
« Reply #9 on: October 10, 2018, 12:35:39 PM »
 :rotflmao: :nerd: :nerd: afternoon Leech!!  :happy1:
2015 deer slayer!!!!!!!!!!

Offline delcecchi

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 1619
  • Karma: +18/-237
  • Liked: 56
  • Likes Given: 17
Re: Judge tosses case against.....
« Reply #10 on: October 12, 2018, 03:58:16 AM »

Well at least North Dakota still has some Balls! It's the difference between our pussy libber Blue state and a  law up holding Red state!  :coffee:

"Michael Foster spent time in prison for his part in a similar event in North Dakota".

Before youse guys get the rope out, you might notice that these people were charged with "damaging a pipeline" and the pipeline exec testified there was no damage to the pipeline.   So they didn't do what they were charged with doing.  Seems like letting them go was the right thing to do.   

Now maybe law enforcement or whoever should have charged them with something that they actually did, but that isn't what happened, according to the link.    Maybe trespassing and vandalism didn't carry much penalty so the prosecutor gambled on going big. 

Offline Rebel SS

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 13810
  • Karma: +104/-26
  • Inventor of Minnow Magic
  • Liked: 827
  • Likes Given: 475
Re: Judge tosses case against.....
« Reply #11 on: October 12, 2018, 09:34:21 AM »
Malicious mischief.
"We may lose and we may win, though we will never be here again".  Eagles

Offline Leech~~

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 719
  • Karma: +15/-9
  • Liked: 102
  • Likes Given: 409
Re: Judge tosses case against.....
« Reply #12 on: October 12, 2018, 10:20:42 AM »
Before youse guys get the rope out, you might notice that these people were charged with "damaging a pipeline" and the pipeline exec testified there was no damage to the pipeline.   So they didn't do what they were charged with doing.  Seems like letting them go was the right thing to do.   

Now maybe law enforcement or whoever should have charged them with something that they actually did, but that isn't what happened, according to the link.    Maybe trespassing and vandalism didn't carry much penalty so the prosecutor gambled on going big.

Oh I see where you and the rest of the soft hearts are coming from.  Your saying it's kind of like the kid who whips dog crap on your door and rings the bell! Nothing really hurt!  :confused:

I say the bast-ers should be no where near pipelines or any utilities unless they want to get shot as infrastructure Terrorists! This is not a dam game to play peek-a-boo with some tree huggers.  :mad1:
Cooking over a open fire is all fun and games until someone losses a wiener!

Offline delcecchi

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 1619
  • Karma: +18/-237
  • Liked: 56
  • Likes Given: 17
Re: Judge tosses case against.....
« Reply #13 on: October 12, 2018, 11:30:32 AM »
Before youse guys get the rope out, you might notice that these people were charged with "damaging a pipeline" and the pipeline exec testified there was no damage to the pipeline.   So they didn't do what they were charged with doing.  Seems like letting them go was the right thing to do.   

Now maybe law enforcement or whoever should have charged them with something that they actually did, but that isn't what happened, according to the link.    Maybe trespassing and vandalism didn't carry much penalty so the prosecutor gambled on going big.

Oh I see where you and the rest of the soft hearts are coming from.  Your saying it's kind of like the kid who whips dog crap on your door and rings the bell! Nothing really hurt!  :confused:

I say the bast-ers should be no where near pipelines or any utilities unless they want to get shot as infrastructure Terrorists! This is not a dam game to play peek-a-boo with some tree huggers.  :mad1:

Then take it up with prosecutor who charged them.   The judge went by the charges.   Perhaps it was a setup  or a case of "overcharging" in an attempt to really stick it to them.    And apparently they did no harm to infrastructure, so that means as terrorists they were pretty ineffectual.   

Yeah, they could have been, and I agree should have been, charged with something that could have led to a conviction, but they weren't.   I'll let the legal experts speculate on what those charges could have been, and what kind of penalties would have resulted.   Looks like they did nothing that local folks could have charges that would have led to jail time.   

Maybe the feds could have done some sort of "interfering with interstate commerce" etc.   but they don't seem to want to go after protesters very much.

Offline Dotch

  • MNO Moderator
  • Master Outdoorsman
  • *
  • Posts: 2446
  • Karma: +45/-1
  • Liked: 293
  • Likes Given: 209
Re: Judge tosses case against.....
« Reply #14 on: October 12, 2018, 12:47:53 PM »
Meanwhile, back at the ranch, del begins preparing supper... ;)

Time itself is bought and sold, the spreading fear of growing old contains a thousand foolish games that we play. (Neil Young)

Offline LPS

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 5615
  • Karma: +53/-8
  • Liked: 367
  • Likes Given: 946
Re: Judge tosses case against.....
« Reply #15 on: October 12, 2018, 01:08:19 PM »
 :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:  You're  going to irritate him Dotch..... 

Offline roony

  • Xtreme Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 240
  • Karma: +11/-3
  • Liked: 46
  • Likes Given: 22
Re: Judge tosses case against.....
« Reply #16 on: October 12, 2018, 01:31:37 PM »
Those condoms seem a little big for del's weenies.

Offline delcecchi

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 1619
  • Karma: +18/-237
  • Liked: 56
  • Likes Given: 17
Re: Judge tosses case against.....
« Reply #17 on: October 12, 2018, 03:01:38 PM »
But you repeat yourselves. 
But you repeat yourselves. 
But you repeat yourselves. 
But you repeat yourselves. 
But you repeat yourselves. 
But you repeat yourselves. 
But you repeat yourselves. 

Offline mike89

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 6968
  • Karma: +39/-7
  • Liked: 222
  • Likes Given: 358
Re: Judge tosses case against.....
« Reply #18 on: October 12, 2018, 03:04:21 PM »
stuttering now......   interesting....
a bad day of fishing is still better than a good day at work!!

Offline Rebel SS

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 13810
  • Karma: +104/-26
  • Inventor of Minnow Magic
  • Liked: 827
  • Likes Given: 475
Re: Judge tosses case against.....
« Reply #19 on: October 12, 2018, 04:00:35 PM »
But you repeat yourselves. 
But you repeat yourselves. 
But you repeat yourselves. 
But you repeat yourselves. 
But you repeat yourselves. 
But you repeat yourselves. 
But you repeat yourselves.

      :rolleyes:

https://youtu.be/9ji1MMXoAVk
"We may lose and we may win, though we will never be here again".  Eagles

 

Video