Minnesota Outdoorsman - Minnesota Fishing and Hunting Reports

Recent


Author Topic: DNR facing fallout  (Read 128 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Lee Borgersen

  • AKA "Smallmouthguide"
  • Pro-Staff
  • Master Outdoorsman
  • *
  • Posts: 13937
  • Karma: +33/-217
  • 2008-2011 & 2018 MNO Fishing Challenge Champ!
    • Lee's Lake Geneva Guide Service
  • Liked: 282
  • Likes Given: 106
DNR facing fallout
« on: August 15, 2019, 10:15:06 PM »
   Timberjay Editorial: :reporter;

 :police: DNR facing fallout :police:


Agency shouldn’t let push for higher timber targets undermine wildlife habitat
Posted Wednesday, August 14, 2019 5:59 pm

 :coffee: .....
The Department of Natural Resources appears to be breaking faith with hunters, trappers, and outdoor enthusiasts of all kinds through its decision to include lands that are supposed to be managed primarily for wildlife as part of its goal for maximizing the state’s timber harvest. :tut:

 :popcorn: ...
Wildlife is critically important to Minnesota’s outdoor traditions, and at a time when wildlife populations are under increasing threats from climate change, habitat loss, agricultural chemicals, and more, this is the worst possible time to disregard the value of the state’s 1.3 million acres dedicated to wildlife production as part of our statewide system of Wildlife Management Areas, or WMAs.
 
 :reporter;....
Since the founding of the WMA program in the 1950s, the DNR has financed the acquisition of WMA lands primarily from the license fees that hunters pay or the extra donations that drivers make to acquire Critical Habitat license plates. Conservation groups and their members have donated millions of dollars and thousands of acres of land for creation and expansion of WMAs. Outdoor heritage funds, approved by voters specifically for Minnesota’s environment, are also part of the mix.
 
 :bow: ....
In other words, these dedicated wildlife lands exist today precisely because outdoor enthusiasts have been willing to invest in them. They didn’t do so to ensure maximum yield for the wood products industry. :angry2:

 :taz: ....
 They did so to benefit Minnesota’s wildlife. Altering that mission in a way that undermines the very purpose of these lands is an affront to the millions of Minnesotans who have invested in these public lands and who regularly enjoy them.

We don’t mean to suggest that producing timber for harvest isn’t an important goal for the DNR. The state’s wood products industry is incredibly valuable to the northern Minnesota economy and ensuring that there is adequate supply from the state’s commercial forests to sustain the industry has long been a top focus of the DNR, and rightly so.
 
 :pouty: ...
But Minnesota’s public lands have value that goes well beyond the production of commodities. For the vast majority of Minnesotans, the value of our forests lies in their scenic beauty and in the opportunity to see and enjoy wildlife, and it is such values that are potentially undermined by the DNR’s singular focus on increasing timber harvest.

We recognize that DNR leadership sees it differently, and believes that their plan for ramped up harvest still protects these other values. Yet, as we report this week, the people who are really in a position to know, don’t agree with the direction coming from St. Paul. :bonk:
 
 :police:
 A total of 28 DNR area wildlife managers recently signed a letter to DNR Commissioner Sarah Strommen, expressing concern that valuable wildlife habitat is being lost in the rush to cut. And they are not just talking about lost habitat within the state’s commercial forests. They’re talking about habitat lost from WMAs, which aren’t being spared from the ramped-up cutting plan.

That should never happen. When the public invests in wildlife lands in Minnesota, it’s done in good faith, and with the expectation that wildlife production is the primary objective in the management of those lands. In forested WMAs, that certainly doesn’t preclude timber harvest, since it can be a valuable tool for wildlife managers as well. But timber harvest on WMAs should be used when appropriate for wildlife management, not when its necessary to meet an otherwise unrealistic harvest objective for industry.

 As we report this week, prime stands of oak, which produce some of the most valuable wildlife food, have been leveled from WMAs. Closer to home, wildlife managers cite the loss of critical conifer understory as well as denning and nest sites from aspen stands in northern St. Louis County as a result of the DNR’s recent decision to shorten aspen stand rotation, which is part of the ramped-up harvest initiative. :moon:

While the DNR is boosting harvest to help the wood products industry, let’s not forget that there’s another major industry that could be undermined by the current policies. Outdoor recreation, such as hunting and wildlife watching, is a major economic factor in Minnesota, one that’s estimated to generate a billion dollars in sales annually and to employ tens of thousands of Minnesotans.

 :tut: ......
We shouldn’t have to sacrifice quality wildlife habitat to sustain the state’s wood products industry. If the DNR wants to ramp up timber harvests, it should do so by increasing the harvest on private lands, by hiring more consulting foresters to work with private landowners. That’s where harvest levels have declined in recent years. Making up for the shortfall of timber harvest on private lands by sacrificing the mission of public lands dedicated to wildlife management is absolutely the wrong way to go.


 :doah: ....
These dedicated wildlife lands exist today precisely because outdoor enthusiasts have been willing to invest in them. They didn’t do so to ensure maximum yield for the wood products industry. They did so to benefit Minnesota’s wildlife.”
« Last Edit: August 15, 2019, 10:26:10 PM by Lee Borgersen »
Proud Member of the CWCS.
http://www.cwcs.org

Member of Walleyes For Tomorrow.
www.walleyesfortomorrow.org

              Many BWCA Reports
http://leeslakegenevaguideservice.com/boundry_%2712.htm

If you help someone when they're in trouble, they will remember you when they're in trouble again

Offline LPS

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 7854
  • Karma: +56/-8
  • Liked: 1031
  • Likes Given: 2588
Re: DNR facing fallout
« Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 07:01:18 AM »
The DNR is losing it's way.  I am also very upset about them getting in the fight to change the name of Lake Calhoun.  That is not what the DNR is for in my mind.  They are spending big dollars on that issue too.  NOW THIS!!!  Something stinks here.

Offline delcecchi

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 2037
  • Karma: +19/-337
  • Liked: 168
  • Likes Given: 30
Re: DNR facing fallout
« Reply #2 on: Yesterday at 07:48:49 AM »
Interesting. 
There doesn't seem to be an expanded harves.the h.here around Cook.  The customers in this area have decreased, and I see many fewer  log trucks on the road. 

Imported paper and lumber has increased, and the companies have sold off land.  I wonder what is really going on. 

Offline Rebel SS

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 18931
  • Karma: +176/-32
  • "We may never pass this way again"...Seals & Croft
  • Liked: 2325
  • Likes Given: 896
Re: DNR facing fallout
« Reply #3 on: Yesterday at 09:37:40 AM »
Wildlife managers object to Minnesota agency’s timber plan

August 15, 2019
MINNESOTA NEWS, MINNESOTA NEWS FROM THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — Minnesota wildlife managers say Department of Natural Resources leadership is mismanaging the upcoming timber harvest.   :angry:

Minnesota Public Radio News reports managers say the mishandling could risk altering state forest lands for the animals that depend on them and for people who recreate there.

MPR News obtained a letter in which 28 DNR wildlife managers, assistant wildlife managers and scientists outlined their concerns last month to Commissioner Sarah Strommen and Assistant Commissioner Bob Meier.

The group disagrees with DNR’s plan to increase timber harvest by 8.75%. The letter says the group doesn’t believe it’s scientifically honest to say that the 10-year timber plan is “beneficial to wildlife.”

DNR leadership denies the claims and stands behind its sustainable timber harvest analysis. They say the plan stays true to the intent of wildlife management areas.

                                             #
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 10:19:07 AM by Rebel SS »

Offline Steve-o

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 1356
  • Karma: +10/-6
  • Liked: 387
  • Likes Given: 45
Re: DNR facing fallout
« Reply #4 on: Yesterday at 11:35:00 AM »
I don't know...  Its probably local and anecdotal, but I've certainly noticed an uptick in clear cut logging in the areas up north where I frequent.
 :mad1:

Offline delcecchi

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 2037
  • Karma: +19/-337
  • Liked: 168
  • Likes Given: 30
Re: DNR facing fallout
« Reply #5 on: Yesterday at 11:47:47 AM »
Turns out the DNR puts out a report on public stumpage sales and price.    Looks like price went up in 2014 and stayed.  Amount about the same.  Was there a trade thing with Canada about then?

I attached the pdf for 2018 if anyone is interested.  Even has data by county.   
I couldn't figure out how to just insert a few of the graphs, sorry.   




Offline markn

  • Xtreme Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 335
  • Karma: +2/-0
  • Liked: 79
  • Likes Given: 71
Re: DNR facing fallout
« Reply #6 on: Yesterday at 12:41:42 PM »
Must be out of the loop somehow, didn't know the DNR was in the timber business too.
mm

Offline delcecchi

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 2037
  • Karma: +19/-337
  • Liked: 168
  • Likes Given: 30
Re: DNR facing fallout
« Reply #7 on: Yesterday at 01:18:14 PM »
They manage timber harvest on public land, run auctions for stumpage etc.  They also provide advice to private landowners about forest management.

https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/forestry/index.html

Here is the list of divisions for the DNR
Divisions
Ecological & Water Resources
Enforcement
Fish and Wildlife
Forestry
Lands and Minerals
Parks and Trails
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 01:19:55 PM by delcecchi »

Offline LPS

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 7854
  • Karma: +56/-8
  • Liked: 1031
  • Likes Given: 2588
Re: DNR facing fallout
« Reply #8 on: Yesterday at 06:06:27 PM »
Although they do say that after woods are harvested that the new growth is beneficial to moose don't they????  Maybe other things too. ????

Offline delcecchi

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 2037
  • Karma: +19/-337
  • Liked: 168
  • Likes Given: 30
Re: DNR facing fallout
« Reply #9 on: Yesterday at 07:22:26 PM »
Although they do say that after woods are harvested that the new growth is beneficial to moose don't they????  Maybe other things too. ????

Logging is good for some species and not others.....  Hard for a deer to eat a 40 year old aspen.   Might be good for grouse. 

 

Video