O goodie! I need it!!!!!! :happy1:
Dis plan is not as sophisticated as Obummer's brilliant "Cash fur Clunkers" program! :happy1: :crazy:that's probably where Donny big got the idea. We know he isn't smart enough to think of it by himself :sleazy: :tut: :rotflmao:
:rotflmao: .......
Now dat's when we had a real leader runnin da country. :bow:
O goodie! I need it!!!!!! :happy1:
:doah: Reb! :rolleyes: :tut:
Dis does not imply anyting sexual :rotflmao:
Hope we don't haveta join a union too! :rotflmao:that be just the cost to join!!!!!!!! :mooning: :mooning: :mooning: :happy1:
I thought the gov said school districts were to keep everyone on the payroll
So LPS us that are retired have to go get a job to get it??!!??? :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
oh no!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'll prolly get a ticket for a free meal at a restaurant .....:and they'll still be closed.Perkins
wat about couples making over 100,000
Latest from the website:
The payment would phase out entirely for individuals/couples making more than $99,000 annually, meaning people who make more than that would not get any money from the government, according to the proposal.
And it goes by yer 2018 income tax return.
Latest from the website:
The payment would phase out entirely for individuals/couples making more than $99,000 annually, meaning people who make more than that would not get any money from the government, according to the proposal.
And it goes by yer 2018 income tax return.
So, like what happens wit dem dat are on medicaid, food cards, and or subsidised housing. They don't have ta file income taxes I would presume? :confused: Just sayin! :scratch:
Would day still be eligible????
Latest from the website:
The payment would phase out entirely for individuals/couples making more than $99,000 annually, meaning people who make more than that would not get any money from the government, according to the proposal.
And it goes by yer 2018 income tax return.
So, like what happens wit dem dat are on medicaid, food cards, and or subsidised housing. They don't have ta file income taxes I would presume? :confused: Just sayin! :scratch:
Would day still be eligible????
Yes, because it would still be noted with the government, on any monetary/pay that they are issued. Systems tracks all income of all people, regardless of where it comes from. Especially from them.
What tier will you be on with that bustling worm conglomerate? :rotflmao:
where's Glenn, he would take a hit for the team with her!!!! :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :happy1: :happy1:
RSVP won't budge on portions of the bill that allow exec's to give themselves raises and bonuses on the government dime. Now all you Trumpsters tell me how that is right.And the Planned parenthood bail out. No hyde amendment for them.
RSVP won't budge on portions of the bill that allow exec's to give themselves raises and bonuses on the government dime. Now all you Trumpsters tell me how that is right.It was a HUGE problem in the 2008 bank bail out too. There was a loophole that allowed many companies to do some creative bookkeeping allowing their exec's to get 10's of million of $ in extra bonuses. :angry2: :pouty: :bonk: :bs:
RSVP won't budge on portions of the bill that allow exec's to give themselves raises and bonuses on the government dime. Now all you Trumpsters tell me how that is right.It was a HUGE problem in the 2008 bank bail out too. There was a loophole that allowed many companies to do some creative bookkeeping allowing their exec's to get 10's of million of $ in extra bonuses. :angry2: :pouty: :bonk: :bs:
let's wait for this money to come,once it does any bets all the illegals will be 1st inline with they're grubby little hands out or whinning because they get the hoop,I say f'em our citizens ,vets,seniors come 1stgoes the same for 'soveriegn nations' as well!!!!!!!!
From what I hear....Nancy put the nix to the stimulus package.yea i was reading some of the stuff on MSN guess it was quite the show in washington today. cept i dont read anywhere what exactly the holdup or what exactly there fighting over?????????????
That's why (and this is just my opinion) that the speaker of the house position, should be a voted in position...and just not a "gimmey" position... :crazy:it is a voted position, by the majority party of the house.
That's why (and this is just my opinion) that the speaker of the house position, should be a voted in position...and just not a "gimmey" position... :crazy:it is a voted position, by the majority party of the house.
why point out just the house, same should be said for the Senate. It's the same in state government also.That's why (and this is just my opinion) that the speaker of the house position, should be a voted in position...and just not a "gimmey" position... :crazy:it is a voted position, by the majority party of the house.
Just what I mean....The majority party of the house, should not be able to "pick" who the speaker of the house should be....period...
Last I heard the 1200 page bill from Pelosi included the taxpayers eating the Postal service debt, tax credits for solar and wind, and some kind of carbon emission reductions for airlines, among the other critical items to rescue the economy... :angry2:Yea if that's the case she needs to be taken out back and beat. Friggin pshyco dingbat.
Last I heard the 1200 page bill from Pelosi included the taxpayers eating the Postal service debt, tax credits for solar and wind, and some kind of carbon emission reductions for airlines, among the other critical items to rescue the economy... :angry2:Yea if that's the case she needs to be taken out back and beat. Friggin pshyco dingbat.
From what I just read it looks like the Dems are trying to keep the money going to workers and health care people. Trying to make sure it is not a corporate slush fund like the Bank bailout turned out to be. That is pissing Moscow Mitch off. Humpty is nervous his rich friends are getting hurt by all of this and wants to put people back to work to keep them rich. Between the whining Dems and the crooked Reps it is going to be hard to pick out who to vote for this time. They are all crooks.yea I agree but its both sides.Trump wants to keep his group rich and Pelosi is :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
From what I just read it looks like the Dems are trying to keep the money going to workers and health care people. Trying to make sure it is not a corporate slush fund like the Bank bailout turned out to be. That is pissing Moscow Mitch off. Humpty is nervous his rich friends are getting hurt by all of this and wants to put people back to work to keep them rich. Between the whining Dems and the crooked Reps it is going to be hard to pick out who to vote for this time. They are all crooks.The dems are trying to cram a bunch of the new green deal chit into this bill. Not the place for it. As for the corporate chit they are trying to keep the economy from totally collapsing to the point it would be worse than the great depression. What POS Pelosi and Schumer are doing is a major joke. They should be brought out back and have some sense beaten into them.
i totally and 100% agree with ya JB!!!!!!!!!! :happy1: :happy1:From what I just read it looks like the Dems are trying to keep the money going to workers and health care people. Trying to make sure it is not a corporate slush fund like the Bank bailout turned out to be. That is pissing Moscow Mitch off. Humpty is nervous his rich friends are getting hurt by all of this and wants to put people back to work to keep them rich. Between the whining Dems and the crooked Reps it is going to be hard to pick out who to vote for this time. They are all crooks.The dems are trying to cram a bunch of the new green deal chit into this bill. Not the place for it. As for the corporate chit they are trying to keep the economy from totally collapsing to the point it would be worse than the great depression. What POS Pelosi and Schumer are doing is a major joke. They should be brought out back and have some sense beaten into them.
I agree nothing should be tacked on to the bill but history shows us why checks and balances are needed on how the money is used.I totally agree with the needed to keep track of how the money is used for the corporations.
let's wait for this money to come,once it does any bets all the illegals will be 1st inline with they're grubby little hands out or whinning because they get the hoop,I say f'em our citizens ,vets,seniors come 1stgoes the same for 'soveriegn nations' as well!!!!!!!!
I agree nothing should be tacked on to the bill but history shows us why checks and balances are needed on how the money is used.I totally agree with the needed to keep track of how the money is used for the corporations.
I agree nothing should be tacked on to the bill but history shows us why checks and balances are needed on how the money is used.I totally agree with the needed to keep track of how the money is used for the corporations.
Yes, but it isn't always just evil private sector corporations. Like after 9/11, when everyone donated to the Red Cross (as was recommended*) thinking that Red Cross would forward the money directly to effected individuals. And when they saw how much money came rolling in, they decided they needed it for "infrastructure improvements" so they spent it to be ready for the next disaster.
:angry2:
*And remember they recommended that we all donate to the Red Cross to avoid being taken by hucksters and thieves.
Funny, you don't hear anything from the Red Cross now!:tut: :tut: :tut: :tut: oh yes i do................they vant my blood!!!!!!!!!!! :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
Yeah, they are probably doing something - goodness knows what. :scratch: Apparently you only hear from them when the $$$ are coming in.
I honestly believe that if the Dems drafted a proposal and left it on a table where the Republicans found it and then proposed it as their solution, the Dems would be opposed to it.AND that would also be the case if it was the other way around...............just sayin!!!!!!!!!!!
Funny, you don't hear anything from the Red Cross now!:tut: :tut: :tut: :tut: oh yes i do................they vant my blood!!!!!!!!!!! :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
Yeah, they are probably doing something - goodness knows what. :scratch: Apparently you only hear from them when the $$$ are coming in.
I think I was in 10th grade when I learned that everyone and every business ought to have a six month reserve of liquid assets to prepare for catastrophes. What in the world happened to real conservatives?
:rotflmao: :rotflmao: well then they got over 6 gallons of thinned out blue blood!!👍 :rotflmao:Funny, you don't hear anything from the Red Cross now!:tut: :tut: :tut: :tut: oh yes i do................they vant my blood!!!!!!!!!!! :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
Yeah, they are probably doing something - goodness knows what. :scratch: Apparently you only hear from them when the $$$ are coming in.
Not yur blood....For one, it's blue...and two, it;s thinned out from alcohol.... :rotflmao:
As long as there is no end to how much money they can hand out, I hope there is something in there for the farmers too. They have been operating without profit for about 3 years now due to government policies. I am talking about smaller family farms not corporate interests.Well the farmers around here sure have plenty of money and they are not corporate farmers.
glenn57, you are absolutely right my man. Both sides want to position themselves so they can take 100% of the credit and 0% of the blame. :angry2:THANKS, deadeye. the :bs: these politicians play on both sides the isle drive me crazy. I know of several people that where in the legislator here in Minnesota that after 1 term bailed out. they used the words spend more time with there family but the real reason they got out was the constant bickering. if a bill came up and it was a good bill for the people, it depended what party it came from. opposing party...…….they were badgered to vote against it.
:scratch: So like, do we have ta clam our stimulus checks as income at tax time. :confused:
:scratch: So like, do we have ta clam our stimulus checks as income at tax time. :confused:
Now don't go upsettin' da apple cart already!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :doah:
:scratch: So like, do we have ta clam our stimulus checks as income at tax time. :confused:
Now don't go upsettin' da apple cart already!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :doah:
:tut: Guess-in don't count now :sad:
Any one?.....Any one?... Buelar ..Anyone? :scratch:
Take a look at commodity pricing versus cost of production. They had some good years in the past I agree but maybe they saved the money instead of squandering it. They shouldn't be penalized for that.
U of M says a little over $500 per acre to put in a crop not including land. This was at a "fair rent" seminar I attended late this winter. So that is a break even point of about $2.50Take a look at commodity pricing versus cost of production. They had some good years in the past I agree but maybe they saved the money instead of squandering it. They shouldn't be penalized for that.
Cost of production is heavily influenced by the cost of land. If the land is owned outright the actual cost, or cash flow, is much lower. Likewise machinery. Yes it depreciates, but it is a fixed cost or maybe no actual cash cost.
Looks like the U of Iowa says cost for 2020 not including land and labor is right around $2.00 per acre for corn.
I'll attach the pdf. of the full report.
Money ain't free.....they'll tax it back. Just like they do any refunds ya get back...add it to NEXT years gross income... :banghead: $$$$$$$$$$
U of M says a little over $500 per acre to put in a crop not including land. This was at a "fair rent" seminar I attended late this winter. So that is a break even point of about $2.50Take a look at commodity pricing versus cost of production. They had some good years in the past I agree but maybe they saved the money instead of squandering it. They shouldn't be penalized for that.
Cost of production is heavily influenced by the cost of land. If the land is owned outright the actual cost, or cash flow, is much lower. Likewise machinery. Yes it depreciates, but it is a fixed cost or maybe no actual cash cost.
Looks like the U of Iowa says cost for 2020 not including land and labor is right around $2.00 per acre for corn.
I'll attach the pdf. of the full report.
per bushel before land cost, if yield is best case scenario.
Good! Shut down the ethanol crap!:tut: :tut: :tut: I have 2 shops that supplied a lot of structural steel to them places!!!!!!!!! :evil:
Four repubs are now demanding a change to the way the unemployment is written. So it may not go through yet.well feel the bern…..is bucky too!!!!!!!!!! :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
so does everyone get a check or are there going to be folks who won't get one?? like folks that are retired???
so does everyone get a check or are there going to be folks who won't get one?? like folks that are retired???I heard they will start sending checks the beginning of the alphabet.
Yeah, $2.00 per bushel. Sorry for the typo.
Lots more detail in the document attached above.
And that link to the albert lee paper just offers to let me subscribe... naga da as dana carvey said...
I was on a conference call with US Rep Tom Emmer and from what he said it doesn't sound like retired people get any money. Not positive but that is what he implied.
Or as I used to tell my girlfirends, keep yer panties on:
Yeah, $2.00 per bushel. Sorry for the typo.
Lots more detail in the document attached above.
And that link to the albert lee paper just offers to let me subscribe... naga da as dana carvey said...
What you posted basically is a crop budget worksheet, something guys who go to their bankers/lenders for operating loans do routinely every year. Loan officers require it in most cases. I have guys in my office every year wanting info on what to stick in those slots agronomically. IA St. has no exclusive on that. You can make the numbers come out any way you want by varying yield and price.
Or as I used to tell my girlfirends, keep yer panties on:
Capitol Comments by Peggy Bennett
Peggy Bennett
Imagine working on your taxes and coming upon the surprise discovery that you owe the IRS $100,000. Immediately.
Though it may sound far-fetched, it is reality.
Last fall, a Wells farmer received a $100,000 tax bill that he had no idea was coming. Not having tens of thousands of dollars sitting around, he was forced to mortgage his house to pay for it. Unless the issue that caused this immense tax bill is fixed, he will go out of business next year.
I have heard from other area farmers and business owners with similar horror stories, as have other lawmakers around the state.
So what is causing these unbelievable tax bills? A failure of the Minnesota Legislature to fully conform with the federal tax code. Specifically, Section 179, which deals with accelerated depreciation.
Last session, Gov. Tim Walz signed into law a plan that directed the Department of Revenue to review Section 179 claims, adjust for new expensing limits and review any gains or losses from the equipment they traded in.
This meant a farmer or business owner who traded in farm equipment or other machinery in 2018, and realized a financial gain on that equipment, was subject to paying income taxes on that gain immediately. Whereas on the federal level, that tax increase was negated by higher upfront expensing limits. The tax bill signed by Gov. Walz only allowed the higher expensing limits over a six-year period, resulting in a tax increase in year one for farmers with only a promise it would be negated over six years.
While it may sound confusing, it’s definitely not a laughing matter for farmers and other small business owners — such as dry cleaners or dental offices — that find themselves in this impossible situation.
This session I am co-authoring legislation that would fully fund conformity to Section 179 in order to help those who have traded equipment and had that trade value counted as income. The legislation would also cancel any penalties and interest issued by the Department of Revenue on any unpaid debts that had been created due to this ordeal.
In talking with those who are dealing with these enormous tax bills, these people are going to be forced to leave a profession they love unless the Legislature acts. With a $1.5 billion budget surplus, we have funds available to make things right and easily fix this Section 179 mistake that was approved by House Democrats and signed into law last year.
State Rep. Peggy Bennett, R-Albert Lea, represents Minnesota House District 27A, which includes almost all of Freeborn County, along with parts of Faribault, Mower, Steele and Dodge counties. She can be reached by phone at 651-296-8216 or by email at rep. peggy.bennett@house.mn.
so I read this blurb about the stimulis check. pretty bland if ya ask me. it, from what I read, a $1200 check will be sent to people makes 75 grand or less and be reduced for incomes higher.
now what's not clear is that to each individual in the house??? mine would be somewhat reduced, but my wife is only getting ssd and don't even get close to the 75 g!!!!!!! or is this per household based on the gross filing a married joint return>>>>>>
I want 2!!!!!!!!!! :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
so I read this blurb about the stimulis check. pretty bland if ya ask me. it, from what I read, a $1200 check will be sent to people makes 75 grand or less and be reduced for incomes higher.
now what's not clear is that to each individual in the house??? mine would be somewhat reduced, but my wife is only getting ssd and don't even get close to the 75 g!!!!!!! or is this per household based on the gross filing a married joint return>>>>>>
I want 2!!!!!!!!!! :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
Private pensions are income to the feds... And social security is too, depending on how much other income you have.
From what I just read it is your income on your tax returns. SS does count as income from what I just read. Not sure if pensions do yet.
Yeah, $2.00 per bushel. Sorry for the typo.
Lots more detail in the document attached above.
And that link to the albert lee paper just offers to let me subscribe... naga da as dana carvey said...
What you posted basically is a crop budget worksheet, something guys who go to their bankers/lenders for operating loans do routinely every year. Loan officers require it in most cases. I have guys in my office every year wanting info on what to stick in those slots agronomically. IA St. has no exclusive on that. You can make the numbers come out any way you want by varying yield and price.
Or as I used to tell my girlfirends, keep yer panties on:
Capitol Comments by Peggy Bennett
Peggy Bennett
Imagine working on your taxes and coming upon the surprise discovery that you owe the IRS $100,000. Immediately.
Though it may sound far-fetched, it is reality.
Last fall, a Wells farmer received a $100,000 tax bill that he had no idea was coming. Not having tens of thousands of dollars sitting around, he was forced to mortgage his house to pay for it. Unless the issue that caused this immense tax bill is fixed, he will go out of business next year.
I have heard from other area farmers and business owners with similar horror stories, as have other lawmakers around the state.
So what is causing these unbelievable tax bills? A failure of the Minnesota Legislature to fully conform with the federal tax code. Specifically, Section 179, which deals with accelerated depreciation.
Last session, Gov. Tim Walz signed into law a plan that directed the Department of Revenue to review Section 179 claims, adjust for new expensing limits and review any gains or losses from the equipment they traded in.
This meant a farmer or business owner who traded in farm equipment or other machinery in 2018, and realized a financial gain on that equipment, was subject to paying income taxes on that gain immediately. Whereas on the federal level, that tax increase was negated by higher upfront expensing limits. The tax bill signed by Gov. Walz only allowed the higher expensing limits over a six-year period, resulting in a tax increase in year one for farmers with only a promise it would be negated over six years.
While it may sound confusing, it’s definitely not a laughing matter for farmers and other small business owners — such as dry cleaners or dental offices — that find themselves in this impossible situation.
This session I am co-authoring legislation that would fully fund conformity to Section 179 in order to help those who have traded equipment and had that trade value counted as income. The legislation would also cancel any penalties and interest issued by the Department of Revenue on any unpaid debts that had been created due to this ordeal.
In talking with those who are dealing with these enormous tax bills, these people are going to be forced to leave a profession they love unless the Legislature acts. With a $1.5 billion budget surplus, we have funds available to make things right and easily fix this Section 179 mistake that was approved by House Democrats and signed into law last year.
State Rep. Peggy Bennett, R-Albert Lea, represents Minnesota House District 27A, which includes almost all of Freeborn County, along with parts of Faribault, Mower, Steele and Dodge counties. She can be reached by phone at 651-296-8216 or by email at rep. peggy.bennett@house.mn.
So, if you own the land, what is the break even price of corn, in terms of cash flow?
Dotch,
The story about owing $100,000 in taxes left out one BIG fact. Back in 2018 when the equipment was purchased, the buyer used section 179 to deduct the equipment cost thus reducing his tax bill by $100,000. Now, because he decided to sell the equipment and not use it in production (the reason he could deduct it in the first place) he should be required to repay the windfall that was accepted in 2018. So, in effect the person should have the $100,000 in the bank to pay back the windfall.
Dotch,
The story about owing $100,000 in taxes left out one BIG fact. Back in 2018 when the equipment was purchased, the buyer used section 179 to deduct the equipment cost thus reducing his tax bill by $100,000. Now, because he decided to sell the equipment and not use it in production (the reason he could deduct it in the first place) he should be required to repay the windfall that was accepted in 2018. So, in effect the person should have the $100,000 in the bank to pay back the windfall.
Did you not read this part?
This meant a farmer or business owner who traded in farm equipment or other machinery in 2018, and realized a financial gain on that equipment, was subject to paying income taxes on that gain immediately. Whereas on the federal level, that tax increase was negated by higher upfront expensing limits. The tax bill signed by Gov. Walz only allowed the higher expensing limits over a six-year period, resulting in a tax increase in year one for farmers with only a promise it would be negated over six years.
Dotch,
The story about owing $100,000 in taxes left out one BIG fact. Back in 2018 when the equipment was purchased, the buyer used section 179 to deduct the equipment cost thus reducing his tax bill by $100,000. Now, because he decided to sell the equipment and not use it in production (the reason he could deduct it in the first place) he should be required to repay the windfall that was accepted in 2018. So, in effect the person should have the $100,000 in the bank to pay back the windfall.
Did you not read this part?
This meant a farmer or business owner who traded in farm equipment or other machinery in 2018, and realized a financial gain on that equipment, was subject to paying income taxes on that gain immediately. Whereas on the federal level, that tax increase was negated by higher upfront expensing limits. The tax bill signed by Gov. Walz only allowed the higher expensing limits over a six-year period, resulting in a tax increase in year one for farmers with only a promise it would be negated over six years.
And my friend that had a short sale on her house had to pay taxes on the "gain" associated with the amount of forgiven debt, since she tried to hang on too long and the special provision expired. The IRS is still after the money after like a decade. She is/was still working in her 70s
Never thought about that happening. Surprise surprise.
I thought the stimulus thing was a done deal...? Now saw Pelosi on the news, said it needs some tweaking, and hope to have it done by NEXT TUESDAY..... :confused:
Some guy I didn't recognize said this is insane; the people need the money NOW....so, what's goin' on?
Think I'll go make an omelette. :rolleyes:
I thought the stimulus thing was a done deal...? Now saw Pelosi on the news, said it needs some tweaking, and hope to have it done by NEXT TUESDAY.....
Some guy I didn't recognize said this is insane; the people need the money NOW....so, what's goin' on?
I said that 2 days ago that after the senate passed the bill it still had to go thru the house before it would get to Trump. And you knew Pelosi was going to screw with it.yea the last I read it was a rebulican that sounded like he was going to hold up the vote. it doesn't matter I hope this election all those wave wacko's get voted out!!!!!!!!!!! man this sheet is getting discusting. even in this termoi neither side can work together. :angry2: :angry2: :embarrassed:
I think there are some folks in DC who do a good job. The problem to me is that they are there too long. Some will say election time is a form of term limit. True, but there are too many districts across this country where each party has a stronghold and no other candidates from the other party has a chance. My district has been republican for a long time. Omar's district has been a dem district forever. Look how long Pelosi has been in Congress for example. So we need term limits. But then again even if you have term limits when you have districts controlled by one party, term limits are useless. :confused:good luck.i'll be the first to admit I was one that firmly believed elections were term limits, but have since changed my mind 100%. there is also something to be said about longevity and experience holding a position for a long time, but at this point, especially in politics, its counter productive. and Reiny you have a valid point regarding some of the districts, some of that will never change. unless like what happened in Omar's district where she ousted this Phylis Kahn in the Minnesota house sevral years back.
I think there are some folks in DC who do a good job. The problem to me is that they are there too long. Some will say election time is a form of term limit. True, but there are too many districts across this country where each party has a stronghold and no other candidates from the other party has a chance. My district has been republican for a long time. Omar's district has been a dem district forever. Look how long Pelosi has been in Congress for example. So we need term limits. But then again even if you have term limits when you have districts controlled by one party, term limits are useless. :confused:good luck.In those districts the primary is the election. That's how we got AOC in congress. She beat a complacent incumbent
Union workers get a check but union negotiators do not :rotflmao:good luck.:pouty: :pouty: :pouty: story of my life!!!!!!!!!!! :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
Some people just never learn to read what's what.whats that supposed to mean!??????????
Ditto. Enjoy that beer! :toast:haven't had a drink in 3 weeks.
CHRIST!!!!!!!!!
One of my faves Reb. :happy1: My only regret is I didn't find a way to see The Police when they went on their last tour.Ahh, David Crosby! :happy1: :cool: My 8 track player wore that 1( Deja Vu) out ~ my jr year too. Along with Led Zeppellin 4
After a bomb session this afternoon, I gotta get a haircut. I haven't let mine get this long in quite some time. And with a full beard I was plenty warm moving hay feeders, troughs, mineral block feeders, round bales, etc.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVsbqVJLFow (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVsbqVJLFow)
The James Gang Rides again was another that fell to the same fate too.. :happy1: :cool:
who you guys trying to :bs: :bs:, it was more like the Bee Gees and village people!!!!!! :rotflmao: :rotflmao::tut: :mooning: :pouty: They must've been more YOUR speed :rolleyes: as the Village People didn't start makin any music 'til '77 & I was busy building Oliver tractors by then. :smiley:
naw……...one of my favorites back then was Tommy James and the Shondells. it was a sealed deal listening to them with a few female friends!!!!!!! :sleazy: :sleazy:These kind? :crazy: :doofus: :scratch: :doah: :super smiley: :super smiley: :laughroll: :laughroll:
who you guys trying to :bs: :bs:, it was more like the Bee Gees and village people!!!!!! :rotflmao: :rotflmao::tut: :mooning: :pouty: They must've been more YOUR speed :rolleyes: as the Village People didn't start makin any music 'til '77 & I was busy building Oliver tractors by then. :smiley:
Wait 'til the crackheads with 6 kiddies runnin' around while they score a dime bag, becuz THATS their job, start the big lawsuits with a sympathetic whiny lawyer who also just wants to score big, because they didn't get a check........:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: yea ya just cant trust people from illinios!!!!!! :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
And Lee, I hope you didn't claim the 11 worms you have in yer farm so far as dependents... :rotflmao:
Wait 'til the crackheads with 6 kiddies runnin' around while they score a dime bag, becuz THATS their job, start the big lawsuits with a sympathetic whiny lawyer who also just wants to score big, because they didn't get a check........:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: yea ya just cant trust people from illinios!!!!!! :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
And Lee, I hope you didn't claim the 11 worms you have in yer farm so far as dependents... :rotflmao:
:tut: :tut: :tut: you forget about all the politicians in the clink???????? :rotflmao:Wait 'til the crackheads with 6 kiddies runnin' around while they score a dime bag, becuz THATS their job, start the big lawsuits with a sympathetic whiny lawyer who also just wants to score big, because they didn't get a check........:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: yea ya just cant trust people from illinios!!!!!! :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
And Lee, I hope you didn't claim the 11 worms you have in yer farm so far as dependents... :rotflmao:
Correct A-mondo Glenn :happy1: Especially since Illinois is da largest stronghold Union state in da country! :blues brothers: :pouty:
:tut: :tut: :tut: you forget about all the politicians in the clink???????? :rotflmao:Wait 'til the crackheads with 6 kiddies runnin' around while they score a dime bag, becuz THATS their job, start the big lawsuits with a sympathetic whiny lawyer who also just wants to score big, because they didn't get a check........:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: yea ya just cant trust people from illinios!!!!!! :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
And Lee, I hope you didn't claim the 11 worms you have in yer farm so far as dependents... :rotflmao:
Correct A-mondo Glenn :happy1: Especially since Illinois is da largest stronghold Union state in da country! :blues brothers: :pouty:
them socks are probably like his MAGA hats...……..made in china!!!!!!!!!!! :pouty: :pouty: :cool: :evil: :rotflmao:
The wife said I'll check later when I mentioned it. :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: That means she doesn't want me knowing it is there if it is... :rotflmao:
Was just able to log in to my checking acct for the 1st time today. Tried 3 or 4 times earlier & couldn't get in, it wasn't my lucky day. :pouty:you'll just spend it in Inger anyway. :rotflmao: :super smiley: :super smiley: :laughroll: :laughroll: :laughroll:
:bs: :tut: :mooning: :pouty::nerd: :nerd: :nerd: :nerd: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
Was just able to log in to my checking acct for the 1st time today. Tried 3 or 4 times earlier & couldn't get in, it wasn't my lucky day. :pouty:
we got ours whoop whoop!:scratch: Think it's based off your birthday just like your SS checks. Brother got his yday too & he gets his SS the 1st week of every month. So next week for me, most likely.
:scratch: They already have it if you've ever had to write the IRS a check at tax time. I usually don't have to file but still have been because I can do it on-line for free. My SS check is direct deposit so I don't have to give them my info either because of it. That's how they'll determine how much I get as SS is 85% of my income. Bet the wife's SSD check don't come in the mail either does it? Shared checking acct?yep.
We got ours.
I got mine in my account a while back and another check from the Donald in my birthday card today. I thought I told him I could not be bought!
I got mine in my account a while back and another check from the Donald in my birthday card today. I thought I told him I could not be bought!for this.
Get your revenge. Donate that filthy lucre to a charity of your choice. I suggest channel one given the circumstances.
Thx guys, didn't mean to get things so far off the tracks.It wasn't really you!! It was that guy right after you that started it :rolleyes:, again. :pouty: ;) :laugh: :laugh:
Yeah, I never got as far as to enter my bank info before being told it was already in the mail. With our mail now being forwarded up here it might take a week before I see it. We'll see.
They're still jerking me around yet too. I just figured it must be because I've been known to consort online with anti-Trump union thugs... :evil:I had it sent to me first hand!!!!!!!! :mooning: :mooning: :mooning:
Better not, I'd hate to have to have him put in the klink. ;) :rolleyes: :scratch: Wonder if I could get my money + a bonus from his wife for that though? :rotflmao: :rotflmao::sleazy: :nerd: :nerd: :nerd: :mooning: the postal people are union too!!!!!!! :smoking: :sleazy: :sleazy: :evil: