Wolves a hot topic from the woods to the courts
Ely Echo Editorial
Putting together a meeting to talk about the management of wolves is coming at just the right time here in the North Country. We thank Gerald Tyler for taking the initiative and bringing together various government officials in Ely on Friday at 10 a.m. at Grand Ely Lodge.
Talk of wolves has reached a fever level, especially among deer hunters but also among dog owners who fear for their pet's safety. We've had reports of wolves roaming the downtown area of Ely and hunters seeing more wolves than deer.
The problem isn't with the wolves, the problem is with the way our government is being run. The people running it aren't elected, they aren't professional biologists and they aren't necessarily looking out for the best interest of wolves. The people running the show are the attorneys.
The reason the federal government has been unable to transfer the management of wolves to the states is not for lack of trying. The reason is because the issue is being handled by attorneys in courtrooms, not biologists in the field.
Here's a portion of a news release from the Humane Society that demonstrates our point:
"This is the sixth time in the last five years that a federal government decision to strip wolves of Endangered Species Act protection has been stopped through legal action, but the settlement does not prevent the administration from making another attempt to de-list wolves and turn their fate over to state killing plans."
Or how about this quote from Born Free USA: "The court's decision is great news for wolves and for the integrity of science in government decision-making."
Six times in five years the attorneys were able to use the justice system to manage the wolf population. Got wolves trying to eat your dog for lunch? Frustrated by a local wolf population going up and a deer population going down? Don't blame the DNR, don't blame the Fish and Wildlife Service, blame Faegre & Benson.
One of the largest legal firms in the country, Faegre & Benson knows how to sue the federal government. The Humane Society news release even includes this statement, "The plaintiffs are represented pro bono by the law firm Faegre & Benson."
Pro bono means you don't get paid right? But time and time again we have seen Faegre & Benson get paid by the federal government after they have successfully sued on an issue. That's right, the Humane Society won't have to pay the bill but the taxpayers will.
As long as we keep electing attorneys to run the federal government, attorneys will keep suing the federal government and make money doing so. It's an endless cycle that benefits attorneys, not the people.
And the wolves? Just a pawn in many instances, like the spotted owl or the lynx or the Sprague's pipit, a bird that weighs less than an ounce and has been known to frequent northwest Minnesota and is likely to be next on the list of endangered species.
We have pointed out in the past that the return of the wolf population in northeast Minnesota should be heralded and celebrated. In the 1960s and early 1970s wolves were nearly wiped out in Minnesota. But since then we have returned the wolves to numbers that now have reached a point where management is now viable.
How many wolves are there? Good question. The DNR has tried to determine a population figure but admits the best guess they have is around 3,000 - or the same number since 1998. Is there pressure to make sure that number doesn't go up and increase the chances of the state being able to manage the wolf population? You be the judge on that one.
Attend the meeting on Friday and thank Gerald for bringing this issue to the forefront. But don't expect miracles. There are still going to be endless legal challenges to delisting the wolf and letting the states manage the population.
Don't believe it? The same news release includes this quote, "Wolf recovery has made tremendous strides, but with wolves occupying roughly five percent of their historic range, the job is not yet finished."
Maybe when the wolves invade Minneapolis and Edina and eat the pets of the lawyers at Faegre and Benson things will change. But we wouldn't bet on it.