Recent

Check Out Our Forum Tab!

Click On The "Forum" Tab Under The Logo For More Content!
If you are using your phone, click on the menu, then select forum. Make sure you refresh the page!

The views of the poster, may not be the views of the website of "Minnesota Outdoorsman" therefore we are not liable for what our members post, they are solely responsible for what they post. They agreed to a user agreement when signing up to MNO.

Author Topic: Fanball Sucks  (Read 3388 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mayfly

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 5689
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • MNO
I have to say it....the second year in a row. I cannot stand that site. I really do not like it and I will never play in a league that uses fanball again in my life.

The free yahoo is about 1million times better. I can't believe we pay to use that crap!

I feel a little better.

Offline Spinach

  • Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 13
  • Karma: +8/-7
  • Woodbury Mn
Thats so weird that you feel that way, Fanball is the only site that I like. Yahoo is nice, but you have to pay for the Livescoring feature, so thats where Fanball is better in my opinion, you pay for both but Fanball is way better for up to date info.

I play in another money league at work... ESPN, now that site really sucks, you would think that ESPN would be one of the better ones...

I suppose a persons browser has a lot to do with navigating the sites too.
MNO Fishing Reports
Voted #1 Outdoors Website in MN
Support MNO Sponsors
AKA "Spinach"

Offline Mayfly

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 5689
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • MNO
One of my biggest complaints is that no matter where I am the site is always so and bogged down. For instance tonight I made a few changes in my yahoo league and then I went to fanball....It took forever and it s like that always.

Offline Ryan

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 1013
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • Website Design
I have to use Firefox to use the Fanball site.  The first time I tried using the site with Internet Explorer it locked up my computer.  I am using the beta version of IE 7 though.

Offline JD

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 528
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Andover
I've never had problems on it.

Offline Mayfly

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 5689
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • MNO
I have another gripe!

Something that should be looked at next year in this league is the roster size. 16 should be 14...there is so much crap sitting on peoples benches that they will never do anything with.

It really takes some competitiveness out of the league as well.....


Thats all I have for today ;)

Offline Spinach

  • Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 13
  • Karma: +8/-7
  • Woodbury Mn
Thats where a good draft is the key to winning in fantasy football.

Some people do there homework on the top fantasy producers only, picking up a sleeper or 2 and handcuffing your players is just as important as drafting the best running back in the league. I am speaking for myself only, but my bench players do play in some key games, depending on the matchups for the week.

Last week I started Bret fricken Farve instead of Eli Manning, I looked at the matchups: Manning against the Seahawks vs Farve against the Lions. I sat my #1 qb and went with Farve, he threw for 340 yards and 3 td's. ;D

Depth... Depth... Depth...= championships. ;D

Keenan Mccardell = Sigma crap. ;) j/k I like the 16 player roster.
MNO Fishing Reports
Voted #1 Outdoors Website in MN
Support MNO Sponsors
AKA "Spinach"

Offline A-Rod

  • Xtreme Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 126
  • Karma: +0/-0
 ;D

I did a ton of homework when I put my list of the top 200 together... and my draft results blew.  I was lucky to squeek by with a win last week.  What happened?  ;)  Is it too late to change my mind?