Recent

Check Out Our Forum Tab!

Click On The "Forum" Tab Under The Logo For More Content!
If you are using your phone, click on the menu, then select forum. Make sure you refresh the page!

The views of the poster, may not be the views of the website of "Minnesota Outdoorsman" therefore we are not liable for what our members post, they are solely responsible for what they post. They agreed to a user agreement when signing up to MNO.

Author Topic: rejects DNR fish seizure  (Read 1688 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lee Borgersen

  • AKA "Smallmouthguide"
  • Pro-Staff
  • Master Outdoorsman
  • *
  • Posts: 15328
  • Karma: +40/-562
  • 2008-2011-2018-2019 2020 Fish Challenge Champ!
    • Lee's Lake Geneva Guide Service
    Court rejects home search and fish seizure by DNR officer :police:

 March 20, 2014
 

Mille Lacs Lake area anglers face heavy fines for over-limit fish, more
AITKIN — Judge John R. Solien of Aitkin County on Tuesday granted a defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized in a search that was conducted in an angler’s home on Mille Lacs Lake without a warrant in July.



 :coffee: The plot thickens..........
According to court documents, Richard Southworth and Linda Southworth were observed by DNR Conservation Officer Chris Tetrault fishing with an extra fishing line.

When the Southworth and DNR boats docked at Southworth’s home Tetrault asked if he could look inside the home to see if there were additional fish in the freezer. The defendant replied: “I wish you wouldn’t.” The conversation continued, the court documents said, with Tetrault asking again about searching the freezer and the defendant said “I guess I can’t stop you, can I?”

Officer Tetrault responded “Well, I’d, you know, I’d like if we could just go look together and then we will be a, we’ll figure what we’re going to do from there, okay?”

The defendant, in testimony, said he said “okay” at some point.

The Southworths were later charged with possession of a gross over-limit of wild animal, a gross misdemeanor.

The defendant’s argument was that a warrantless search of the defendant’s home was illegal because it was in violation of his constitutional rights.

The court ruling stated: “The burden is on the state to prove ... that the defendant was clearly and voluntarily manifesting consent to a search. Under the totality of the circumstances, the court finds the state has failed to reach this burden. The defendant was not voluntarily consenting, explicitly or implicitly, to a search of his home, but instead merely submitting to the authority of Officer Tetrault.”

In a news release, defense attorney Bill Peterson of Bloomington said the decision was important for the protection of privacy of Minnesota sportsmen.

The defense attorney said the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects citizens in places or circumstances where they have “an expectation of privacy.”

Peterson noted a person’s home is often considered the most important place where privacy is expected.

Peterson said the DNR seized Southworth’s fishing boat and trailer and claimed it to be confiscated to the state.

“It was a valuable rig, and with the victory on the evidence suppression in court, I think we can get it back to the Southworths,” Peterson said.

Nicholas Wanka, an assistant county attorney for Aitkin County, could not be reached for comment Thursday night.

    :reporter; "And Now You Know The Rest Of The Story" :popcorn:
Proud Member of the CWCS.
http://www.cwcs.org

Member of Walleyes For Tomorrow.
www.walleyesfortomorrow.org

              Many BWCA Reports
http://leeslakegenevaguideservice.com/boundry_%2712.htm

If you help someone when they're in trouble, they will remember you when they're in trouble again