Recent

Check Out Our Forum Tab!

Click On The "Forum" Tab Under The Logo For More Content!
If you are using your phone, click on the menu, then select forum. Make sure you refresh the page!

The views of the poster, may not be the views of the website of "Minnesota Outdoorsman" therefore we are not liable for what our members post, they are solely responsible for what they post. They agreed to a user agreement when signing up to MNO.

Author Topic: Feds' plan to remove wolf  (Read 2919 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lee Borgersen

  • AKA "Smallmouthguide"
  • Pro-Staff
  • Master Outdoorsman
  • *
  • Posts: 15328
  • Karma: +40/-562
  • 2008-2011-2018-2019 2020 Fish Challenge Champ!
    • Lee's Lake Geneva Guide Service
  Federal plan to remove wolf protections

 :coffee: ....
Federal plan to remove wolf protections to open for public comment
By John Myers / Forum News Service on Mar 14, 2019 at 6:59 p.m.
 The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service on Wednesday said it will make good on a promise made last June to delist wolves across the lower 48 states, removing Engendered Species Act protections. Courtesy of Michigan Technological University
The U.S. Interior Department on Thursday, March 14, said it will publish its plan to remove federal protections for wolves in the Federal Register Friday, giving the public until mid-May to comment on the proposal.

The plan, first promised last June and announced again last week, would have the most impact on Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan where established populations of wolves currently exist but where a court order has retained Endangered Species Act Protections for them.

 :popcorn: ...
The federal plan, developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in recent months, would “delist” wolves across all the contiguous U.S., even where they do not exist, although acts of Congress already removed federal protections for Rocky Mountain and other western wolves.

Comments on the plan must be made within 60 days of publication — by May 14. Information on the plan, called a federal rule, along with instructions on how to comment, can be found at fws.gov/home/wolfrecovery.

Livestock farmers and some hunting groups support ending federal protections for wolves, saying the animals have become too numerous and their numbers need to be culled to reduce wolf-human conflicts. :happy1:

Wolf supporters say that, while the animals are indeed thriving in the upper Great Lakes region, state agencies moved too fast to kill too many wolves once federal protections were withdrawn in 2012. Critics also note that wolves have not recovered across a broad portion of their original range, in more states, as the federal Endangered Species Act appears to call for.

The Fish & Wildlife Service, part of the U.S. Interior Department, has tried multiple times — through the Clinton, Bush and Obama administrations — to delist wolves in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan, saying the big predators have fully recovered here after brushing with extinction in the 1960s and 1970s.

The most recent delisting efforts, in 2012, allowed state agencies to hold wolf trapping and hunting seasons for three years until late 2014 when a federal judge ruled that the agency had erred in taking wolves off the endangered list too soon. That decision was upheld in 2017 by a federal appeals court decision, keeping wolves protected across the region to this point.

The Trump administration says it will take its turn at developing a broader wolf proposal that will hold up in court. :bow: Good Luck Wit Dat! :scratch:

“The facts are clear and indisputable — the gray wolf no longer meets the definition of a threatened or endangered species. Today the wolf is thriving on its vast range and it is reasonable to conclude it will continue to do so in the future,” said David Bernhardt, acting U.S. Secretary of the Interior, in a statement Thursday. “Today’s action puts us one step closer to transitioning the extraordinary effort that we have invested in gray wolf recovery to other species who actually need the protections of the Endangered Species Act, leaving the states to carry on the legacy of wolf conservation.”


Critics responded quickly Thursday. :angry2:

“The Trump administration is attempting to sign a death warrant for America’s gray wolves,” said Brett Hartl, government affairs director for the Center for Biological Diversity. “This undemocratic and cowardly proposal would lead to the slaughter of wolves across the country and undo decades of recovery progress. But we’ll fight as hard as we can to stop that from happening.”

The proposal would not impact Mexican gray wolves, which are listed separately under the Endangered Species Act.

The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources estimates about 2,850 wolves in the state, by far the most of any outside Alaska. The Wisconsin DNR estimates just under 1,000 with more than 500 estimated in Michigan's Upper Peninsula.

[attachment deleted by admin]
« Last Edit: March 03/15/19, 07:58:06 AM by Lee Borgersen »
Proud Member of the CWCS.
http://www.cwcs.org

Member of Walleyes For Tomorrow.
www.walleyesfortomorrow.org

              Many BWCA Reports
http://leeslakegenevaguideservice.com/boundry_%2712.htm

If you help someone when they're in trouble, they will remember you when they're in trouble again

Offline Smokey Hills Bandit

  • Xtreme Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 148
  • Karma: +2/-0
« Last Edit: September 09/26/19, 08:12:23 PM by jlynch3 »

Online Leech~~

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 3725
  • Karma: +25/-133

If they would only make a few doc's on Wolves tearing baby calf's apart and decimating the Moose population. May be some of those National Geographic reader folks would change their mind about fluffy!  :mad1:

[attachment deleted by admin]
Cooking over a open fire is all fun and games until someone losses a wiener!

Online glenn57

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 47439
  • Karma: +208/-191
  • 2015 deer contest champ!!!
Leech.... It's clear to me you photo shopped that picture to fit your agenda!!! :pouty: :laughroll: :laughroll: :laughroll: :laughroll: :nerd:

            :popcorn:
2015 deer slayer!!!!!!!!!!

Online Gunner55

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 14927
  • Karma: +21/-3
Heard a couple groups of 'em howlin from both sides of the lake here before, it was 2-3 hours before it started gettin light. People up on the west side of the main lake have seen a group of 8 or 9 along the road goin up there, got some pics of 'em out on the ice from the winter before last too.
Life............. what happens while your making other plans. John Lennon

Offline Smokey Hills Bandit

  • Xtreme Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 148
  • Karma: +2/-0
This is from MN DNR 2019 Moose study.

"The DNR’s detailed field research has shown that wolf predation has consistently accounted for about two-thirds of the calf mortality and one-third of the adult mortality. In some cases, injuries suffered during predation attempts – not the predation itself – ultimately killed the adult moose. "

http://news.dnr.state.mn.us/2019/03/11/northeastern-minnesota-moose-population-remains-low-but-stable/

JL

Offline Reinhard

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 2384
  • Karma: +56/-68
Yes we need to have the wolf population controlled.  I hunt in northern Minnesota and have been since the late 60's.  Same spot also [public land].  The wolf population as I have seen had it's up and down.  However I have never seen the signs of wolves as much as last deer season.  Tracks, howls and even seen them.  Over all of the years I've hunted up there, I have seen wolves a few times and mostly single ones.  But few.

Last year during muzzy hunting, I had a experience of a lifetime for me.  I have never had fear of anything in the woods and I have spent many years deep in the woods.  Met up with bears also.  But last year I saw a pack of wolves.  Started out just hearing them howl a distance away.  This was about 11am and I was getting ready to get off my stand for lunch with my brother a couple of blocks away.

Then the howls became closer and closer.  I think they were chasing a deer.  Then they were right under my stand all of the sudden.  One of them looked up and showed it's teeth and started to click it's teeth together and grunting or growling, but it was different type of sound. 

I took my handgun and took a shot near them and they ran away. Glad I had my 45 along since the muzzy only has one shot.  Made me think if I was already down my stand and started to walk back toward my brother what would have happened since they ran right down the trail toward me that I take in and out.  Maybe nothing and if they saw me they would of ran away anyway.  Who knows.

I told my brother the story and told him I need to make me a drink.  I told him that day that from this point on I will walk to my stand and back with my handgun ready.  Will this happen again?  Probably not, but where I hunt we have many wolves.  I don't want to eliminate wolves.  They are part of the north woods life cycle, predator vs prey but it's getting out of control.  I think there are some up there that will take the law in their own hands.  Seen it before over the years.  Would be better if  the state starts to wake up and not worry about the voters in t he Twin Cities and start to worry about what goes on beyone the cities.  good luck.