Recent

Check Out Our Forum Tab!

Click On The "Forum" Tab Under The Logo For More Content!
If you are using your phone, click on the menu, then select forum. Make sure you refresh the page!

The views of the poster, may not be the views of the website of "Minnesota Outdoorsman" therefore we are not liable for what our members post, they are solely responsible for what they post. They agreed to a user agreement when signing up to MNO.

Author Topic: Mille Lacs walleye lawsuit  (Read 1945 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lee Borgersen

  • AKA "Smallmouthguide"
  • Pro-Staff
  • Master Outdoorsman
  • *
  • Posts: 15328
  • Karma: +40/-562
  • 2008-2011-2018-2019 2020 Fish Challenge Champ!
    • Lee's Lake Geneva Guide Service
       Mille Lacs walleye lawsuit against DNR heads to appeals court

 Tuesday, January 13 2015 
 
  Written by John Enger, Minnesota Public Radio News, 
 
 
Share this!Disgruntled resort owners and citizens' groups argued before a three-judge panel of the Minnesota Court of Appeals on Nov. 20 that the state Department of Natural Resources has mismanaged Mille Lacs Lake.

In April, resort owner Bill Eno, several other local residents and the non-profit advocacy groups Proper Economic Resource Management and Save Mille Lacs Sport Fishing filed suit against the DNR.

Citing a 1998 state constitutional amendment to preserve fishing heritage, they argued that department did not consider it when formulating its latest walleye regulations, which include an extended ban on night fishing.

"The DNR ... could not have designed better plans to destroy the Mille Lacs Lake walleye fishing heritage than the plans that the DNR implemented since 1998," attorney Erick Kaardal wrote in the lawsuit.

The lawsuit seeks to force DNR lake managers to rethink fishery management techniques and listen more closely to local opinion. The three-judge panel is expected to rule on the lawsuit within 90 days.

Eno, who has owned Twin Pines Resort on the western shore of Mille Lacs for two decades, said he has watched DNR regulations tighten, even as walleye numbers decrease. He said the department has crippled the lake's walleye population, and his business.

When the DNR announced regulations temporarily banning night fishing early this spring, Eno had to call dozens of regular customers to cancel their night reservations. The rules hit his business hard, because he makes a lot of his money running fishing launches from 8 p.m. to midnight.

The DNR later re-opened night fishing, but for Eno, the ban was the last straw.

"Sometimes they change the regulations two or three times in the same year." he said. "We used to have customers from Iowa, Illinois and Nebraska. We used to have big groups. They quit coming because we don't know what they'll be able to catch."

Mille Lacs supports a whole industry of resorts and guide services. Eno is the only current resort owner who is among the plaintiffs. They also include Fred Dally, former owner of the Red Door Resort.

Only about half of Mille Lacs resort owners blame the DNR for declining walleye numbers and slower business, said Terry McQuoid, owner of McQuoid's Inn on the southeast side of Mille Lacs. He is not among those who sued.

"I've been on the lake for 40 years," he said. "In that time we've had some bad years, but it always gets better."

Even with the night fishing ban, McQuoid said his resort made only slightly less money than usual. Other resorts did a lot worse, but McQuoid said that's because of bad marketing.

"Twin Pines didn't do well this year," he said, "but they're sort of bringing it on themselves. When you complain that there's no walleye, it's going to scare people off."

Minnesota's Preserve Hunting and Fishing Heritage constitutional amendment notes that hunting and fishing are big parts of Minnesota's heritage and should be managed for public good. It is known as the right to hunt and fish amendment, but can be interpreted in different ways.

The lawsuit argues DNR management did not preserve the fishing heritage of Mille Lacs, a lake often called the "Walleye Capital of the World." It asks that certain DNR regulations be judged unconstitutional.

According to DNR communications director Chris Niskanen, the agency was vested with the power to manage fish and wildlife long before 1998. He said that power isn't affected by the heritage amendment.

"The amendment did not change long-standing laws vesting the agency with the authority and the responsibility to regulate and manage game and fish for the public good," Niskanen said.

Some of the factors the DNR takes into consideration to manage walleye numbers in Mille Lacs are required by treaty obligations. A 1999 U.S. Supreme Court ruling upheld hunting and fishing rights from an 1837 treaty for an area of east central Minnesota that includes Lake Milles Lacs.

In a statement, representatives of the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe, said the tribe has worked with state officials to manage the lake for the long term.

"The Mille Lacs Band Department of Natural Resources and Environment collaborates with the Minnesota DNR and other tribal governments to ensure that the lake remains an asset for this generation and the next seven generations to come," tribal leaders said in the statement.

Minnesota Public Radio News can be heard on MPR's statewide radio network or online at mprnews.org.
 
Proud Member of the CWCS.
http://www.cwcs.org

Member of Walleyes For Tomorrow.
www.walleyesfortomorrow.org

              Many BWCA Reports
http://leeslakegenevaguideservice.com/boundry_%2712.htm

If you help someone when they're in trouble, they will remember you when they're in trouble again

Offline snow1

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 3518
  • Karma: +5/-42
Thanx for posting this,I didn't see this,mustof been some where on the back page of the want add's

The tribe spoke person speaks with fork tongue... They tell the press what they feel the non-natives want to here and go on abouit their buriness,been there done that for years here in Mn,remember "Upper Red Lake?" the most recent? Guess who bailed the lake out to what we have today,and guess who has been commercially fishing it once again and take a wild guess whats happening again on the URL! 2 walleyes daily and a 17" to 26" protected slot....Hmmm sound familiar?

ps- keep in mind we none natives can only fish 20% of the lake,the natives took 800,000 lbs in 2014,none natives guestimate was 200k under a 4 fish daily limit most of the year...wonder how they came up with that #?????
« Last Edit: January 01/19/15, 01:57:50 PM by snow1 »