Recent

Check Out Our Forum Tab!

Click On The "Forum" Tab Under The Logo For More Content!
If you are using your phone, click on the menu, then select forum. Make sure you refresh the page!

The views of the poster, may not be the views of the website of "Minnesota Outdoorsman" therefore we are not liable for what our members post, they are solely responsible for what they post. They agreed to a user agreement when signing up to MNO.

Author Topic: Moose population continues to decline; hunting season to be evaluated  (Read 1232 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline HD

  • Administrator
  • Master Outdoorsman
  • *
  • Posts: 15794
  • Karma: +57/-23
  • #1 Judge (Retired)
    • Minnesota Outdoorsman
Moose population continues to decline; hunting season to be evaluated
(Released February 23, 2012)

Minnesota’s moose population continues to decline, dropping from an estimate of 4,900 in 2011 to 4,230 in 2012, according to the annual aerial survey by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR).
“Estimates from the survey and results from research using radio-collared moose both indicate that the population has been declining in recent years,” said Mark Lenarz, DNR forest wildlife group leader.

Minnesota’s moose population was estimated at 8,840 in 2006 and has trended downward since then.

The causes of moose mortality are not well understood. Of 150 adult moose radio-collared since 2002 in Minnesota, 119 have subsequently died, most from unknown causes thought to be diseases or parasites. Ten moose died as a result of highway vehicle accidents. Two were killed by trains. Only 11 deaths were clearly the result of wolf predation.

This year’s aerial survey, however, showed some positive trends. The number of cows accompanied by calves and twin calves increased in 2012, which means more calves can potentially mature into adults. But the cow and calf ratio, estimated at 36 calves per 100 cows in 2012, remains well below 1990s estimates that likely contribute to a peak population in the early 2000s.

The 2012 survey results also showed the bull-to-cow ratio increased from 2011 to an estimated 108 bulls per 100 cows, indicating that more bulls were available to breed with cows.

DECISION ON HUNTING SEASON TO COME
While this year’s aerial survey showed improved calf survival and bull-to-cow ratio, the DNR will be evaluating the data and consulting with tribal biologists before making a decision on a 2012 hunting season. The decision on the season will be announced in the coming weeks.

Last fall, the DNR continued a bulls-only hunting season and cut the number of moose-hunting permits by more than half, from 213 in 2010 to 105.

Although hunting mortality of bulls is not driving the moose population decline, the state’s moose management plan does have science-based triggers for closing the hunting season. One of those triggers is if the bull-to-cow ratio drops below 0.67 bulls-per-cow for three consecutive years.

While the bull-per-cow ratio dropped to .64 bulls/cow in 2011, it went up this year to 1.08.

ABOUT THE AERIAL SURVEY
DNR wildlife researchers estimate the moose population by conducting an aerial survey of the northeastern Minnesota moose range. The surveys, which have been conducted each year since 1960, are based on flying transects in 49 randomly selected plots spread across the Minnesota’s Arrowhead region.

Since 2005, the downward trend in moose numbers, as reflected in the survey data, has been statistically significant.

Moreover, a study of radio-collared moose in northeastern Minnesota between 2002 and 2008 determined that non-hunting mortality was substantially higher than in moose populations outside of Minnesota. Although the formal study ended in 2008, researchers have continued to monitor non-hunting mortality, which has continued to be high.

A new, two-year study begins in 2013 that will concentrate on identifying disease and parasites that might be responsible for high moose mortality. Funding for the $600,000 study comes from the Minnesota Environmental and Natural Resources Trust Fund, which gets proceeds from the Minnesota State Lottery. The funding, recommended by Legislative-Citizen Commission on Natural Resources, has been appropriated by the Minnesota Legislature.

Funding and personnel for the annual DNR aerial survey are also provided by the Fond du Lac band of Lake Superior Chippewa and 1854 Treaty Authority.

A copy of the 2012 aerial survey report is available online at: http://www.mndnr.gov/hunting/moose

The DNR’s Moose Management and Research Plan, approved in 2011 as a way to possibly identify causes of moose mortality and potentially slow Minnesota’s declining population, is available online at: http://www.mndnr.gov/moose

Mama always said, If you ain't got noth'in nice to say, don't say noth'in at all!

Offline beeker

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 1933
  • Karma: +0/-0
ok.. so I understand the need to protect the moose and all that.. but what I want to know that was left out of this article.  it talks about since 2002 150 moose collared a 119 moose have died? well what is the natural life span of a moose? 10 years is an odd chunk of time statistically does that just make their argument better? what is the natural cycle of moose populations? i thought they had a wide range of territory they covered. my personal feeling is this article is twisted to support not having a season.. which I can support if it is truly needed to grow the population. I hate having to always question what the DNR/media publishes about hunting.. but I've become suspicious over my time as it seems like they are never "for" a season or increased tags regardless of the data.
If science fiction has taught me anything, it's that you can never have enough guns and ammo when the zombies come back to life... "WS"

Offline Bobby Bass

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 5203
  • Karma: +8/-28
From what I have read the average is 8-25 years with the norm being 15-18 years. So there does seem to be a reason for alarm here with the reported deaths. Keep in mind that this is the MN herd we are talking about and as a whole the moose population up north is doing fine. It has been several years since I have seen a moose in the wild where as I would see one or two a season when fishing.
Bobby Bass


Bud and now Barney working the trail again in front of me.

It is not how many years you live, it is how you lived your years!

Offline kenhuntin

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 2037
  • Karma: +0/-5
  • FISH CHAMP#1 2010#10 2009#4 2008 colapsed 2011
They may be dying from tranquilizers and radio collars.
A gun owner is a citizen
Those without are subjects

Offline Lee Borgersen

  • AKA "Smallmouthguide"
  • Pro-Staff
  • Master Outdoorsman
  • *
  • Posts: 15328
  • Karma: +40/-562
  • 2008-2011-2018-2019 2020 Fish Challenge Champ!
    • Lee's Lake Geneva Guide Service
From what I have read the average is 8-25 years with the norm being 15-18 years. So there does seem to be a reason for alarm here with the reported deaths. Keep in mind that this is the MN herd we are talking about and as a whole the moose population up north is doing fine. It has been several years since I have seen a moose in the wild where as I would see one or two a season when fishing.

We haven't seen a moose in the B-dub for the last 5 years and used to see one every year during vacation.
Proud Member of the CWCS.
http://www.cwcs.org

Member of Walleyes For Tomorrow.
www.walleyesfortomorrow.org

              Many BWCA Reports
http://leeslakegenevaguideservice.com/boundry_%2712.htm

If you help someone when they're in trouble, they will remember you when they're in trouble again

Offline beeker

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 1933
  • Karma: +0/-0
so ... then there is "truth" to this and the state shouldn't dilly and or dally over haulting a season.
If science fiction has taught me anything, it's that you can never have enough guns and ammo when the zombies come back to life... "WS"