Recent

Check Out Our Forum Tab!

Click On The "Forum" Tab Under The Logo For More Content!
If you are using your phone, click on the menu, then select forum. Make sure you refresh the page!

The views of the poster, may not be the views of the website of "Minnesota Outdoorsman" therefore we are not liable for what our members post, they are solely responsible for what they post. They agreed to a user agreement when signing up to MNO.

Author Topic: Letter from da udder side  (Read 1126 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lee Borgersen

  • AKA "Smallmouthguide"
  • Pro-Staff
  • Master Outdoorsman
  • *
  • Posts: 15328
  • Karma: +40/-562
  • 2008-2011-2018-2019 2020 Fish Challenge Champ!
    • Lee's Lake Geneva Guide Service
      :police: Letter: DNR puts the wolf’s future in jeopardy :fudd:


By Joanna Dymond from Bemidji on Mar 29, 2014 at 11:01 p.m.

Email: 
The hunting season imposed on wolves so soon after they were removed from the endangered species list has caused great controversy and misunderstanding of the role of the wolf in our ecology.

When I attended last week’s DNR meeting held with deer hunters, I witnessed why the DNR made a grave error for the wolf’s future in Minnesota, by rushing to hunt and trap wolves in 2012.

At one point it became a roomful of deer hunters talking about killing wolves. One man even advocated for using the poison strychnine to kill wolves. The discussion indicated an alarming lack of knowledge about basic ecology.

But the DNR had predicted this. But instead of implementing the Wolf Management Plan, the DNR rushed to a wolf hunt with the newly appointed commissioner Tom Landwehr at the helm.

The wolf hunt seems to have confused many in the public into believing that the wolf hunt serves a purpose or is necessary. It’s hard for many people to believe that the DNR would simply offer public “recreational” wolf hunting, trapping and snaring season on wolves. But there is another darker segment of people and views that came to the DNR’s meeting last week. This was the view that all wolves should be killed. For the wolf, the recreational hunt appears to have encouraged anti-wolf sentiment and even more wolf killing all year ’round

Senate Bill 2256 to temporarily suspend the wolf hunt has passed the house in February 2014 with a majority vote. This is a common sense law that meets many requirements for all involved. It requires information on the outcome of the hunt on the wolf population, a wolf census (some think fewer than 2,000), best practices for farmers, and tribal concerns. If the indiscriminate killing of wolves continues, they will go back on the endangered species list.

Now is the time to take action if you want the wolf hunt suspended. Please don’t hesitate to call Gov. Mark Dayton and let him know how you feel. You also may call Speaker of the House Paul Thissen or Senate Majority Leader Tom Bakk, or your personal representatives in the Legislature.

Joanna Dymond

Bemidji
Proud Member of the CWCS.
http://www.cwcs.org

Member of Walleyes For Tomorrow.
www.walleyesfortomorrow.org

              Many BWCA Reports
http://leeslakegenevaguideservice.com/boundry_%2712.htm

If you help someone when they're in trouble, they will remember you when they're in trouble again

Offline dakids

  • MNO Moderator
  • Master Outdoorsman
  • *
  • Posts: 5053
  • Karma: +9/-6
  • 2013 MNO Fishing Challenge Champ!
The wolf hunt is needed.  I don't like my tax dollars going to a professional trapper that gets paid to kill wolves that are overpopulated.  There are plenty of hunters and trappers that are willing to PAY for the right to hunt or trap a wolf.  They are a great trophy that many people are willing to pay to persue.
Anything that is free is worth saving up for.