Recent

Check Out Our Forum Tab!

Click On The "Forum" Tab Under The Logo For More Content!
If you are using your phone, click on the menu, then select forum. Make sure you refresh the page!

The views of the poster, may not be the views of the website of "Minnesota Outdoorsman" therefore we are not liable for what our members post, they are solely responsible for what they post. They agreed to a user agreement when signing up to MNO.

Author Topic: Mille Lacs walleye population lower than expected  (Read 1317 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline HD

  • Administrator
  • Master Outdoorsman
  • *
  • Posts: 15955
  • Karma: +57/-23
  • #1 Judge (Retired)
    • Minnesota Outdoorsman
Mille Lacs walleye population lower than expected
(Released November 3, 2011)

A recent assessment of Lake Mille Lacs identified a smaller than anticipated walleye population, according to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR).

Based on recent netting assessments, the lake’s walleye index dropped from 10.8 fish per net (22.9 pounds per net) in 2010 to 9.7 fish per net (16 pounds per net) in 2011. This represents the second lowest walleye abundance measured since the DNR large lake monitoring program began in 1983.

The long-term trend of walleye population assessments on Mille Lacs since the mid-1980s has been declining overall, but the trend for female walleyes has been stable. This may reflect the fact that the walleye harvest strategies employed by both the state and the Chippewa Bands are more selective for smaller, male walleyes.

The implications of the decline in males to the overall fishery are not clear. Fisheries biologists are evaluating the new data to better understand those implications and how they might influence future management options.

The new fish population information comes at a time when walleye fishing is good at Mille Lacs. DNR Fisheries managers believe good fishing may continue this winter and spring, even in the face of a decreasing walleye population. This may be due to relatively low numbers of young-of-the-year perch, the primary food sources for young walleye. The perch are also small in size, according to the new assessment data.

Fisheries managers understand that a smaller perch population typically results in hungry walleyes, especially of the sizes anglers prefer to keep. Looking to 2012, a resulting high harvest would be a concern if it is projected to reach or exceed the state’s allocation, which will be set in February in cooperation with Chippewa Band managers.

Northern pike abundance also went down, according to the recent assessment. This was expected given a regulation change in 2011. The former regulation was a 24- to 36-inch protected slot that allowed the keeping of one northern pike longer than 36 inches. In 2011, a new regulation protected northern from 27- to 40-inches and allowed the taking of one fish longer than 40 inches.

Tullibee (cisco) abundance also dropped in 2011 from relatively high abundance levels in 2009 (34 fish per net) and 2010 (11 fish per net) to catches of less than two per net in 2011. The relatively warm late summer may have resulted in higher than usual mortality for this cold-water species.

Smallmouth bass have been increasing in abundance for many years, and although not at an all-time high as observed in 2009 (1.9 fish per net), they were above average in abundance at 1.1 fish per net.

Prior to setting the 2012 regulations, DNR managers will meet with the Mille Lacs Fisheries Input Group, an advisory group of anglers and local business interests, to discuss the status of the lake’s fish populations.
Mama always said, If you ain't got noth'in nice to say, don't say noth'in at all!

Offline JohnWester

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 2294
  • Karma: +9/-8
  • Kabetogama, MN
Another great job by the DNR... and the dipcraps who net the big females out full of eggs in the spring.

and no, they don't all get stripped, and how much gets re-stocked to mille lacs anyway?
If a gun kills people then I can blame a pen for my misspells?

IBOT# 286 big_fish_guy

Offline wallyhntr1

  • Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 24
  • Karma: +0/-0
dont be surprised if/when our wing nuts at the Aitkin DNR lower nonnative limits next year..

Dont believe any walleyes are stripped...  zero go into restocking- purely a commercial destruction of the resource, at our expense....