Recent

Check Out Our Forum Tab!

Click On The "Forum" Tab Under The Logo For More Content!
If you are using your phone, click on the menu, then select forum. Make sure you refresh the page!

The views of the poster, may not be the views of the website of "Minnesota Outdoorsman" therefore we are not liable for what our members post, they are solely responsible for what they post. They agreed to a user agreement when signing up to MNO.

Author Topic: North Dakota survey: Water index drops 80%, duck numbers down 27%  (Read 3617 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline HD

  • Administrator
  • Master Outdoorsman
  • *
  • Posts: 15871
  • Karma: +57/-23
  • #1 Judge (Retired)
    • Minnesota Outdoorsman
North Dakota survey: Water index drops 80%, duck numbers down 27%



by Delta Waterfowl

Conducted annually since 1948, the North Dakota Game and Fish Department’s spring survey of wetlands and ducks in this vital state indicates very dry conditions, with a water index (wetland count) down 80.3 percent from 2020, and nearly 66.7 percent below the long-term average.

Given the drought that is gripping North Dakota — along with much of the prairie pothole region — it’s not surprising that the state’s breeding duck estimate is down nearly 26.9 percent from last year.

“This is the bad news we knew was coming,” said Dr. Frank Rohwer, president and chief scientist of Delta Waterfowl. “The reduction in water is staggering. It’s the highest year-over-year percentage decrease in the history of the North Dakota survey.”

According to Mike Szymanski, North Dakota’s migratory game bird management supervisor, 2020 was the sixth wettest year on record, while 2021 is the fifth driest in the past 74 years.

“That’s an indication of how dynamic this system is that we work in,” he said. “We essentially have no temporary and seasonal basins holding water on the landscape right now. And that has huge ramifications for duck production in the state.”

The more promising news is that breeding duck estimates remain high thanks to carryover from a lengthy wet cycle that’s boosted duck production for more than a decade. Despite declines among key species, this year’s breeding duck index of 2.9 million remains 19 percent above the long-term average and is the 48th highest recorded.

“That’s still a lot of ducks,” Rohwer said. “The problem is I think this will be a ‘one and done’ year for nesting hens, meaning even prolific renesters like mallards won’t attempt to nest again if their first nest fails. And we know that even in a good year, most nests are lost to predators. There’s also a strong probability that duckling survival will be very low. It’s challenging to make ducks without water.”

North Dakota’s survey indicates decreases for most major species from 2020, including mallards, which decreased a whopping 48.7 percent to 448,116 birds — the 28th highest estimate on record, but the lowest since 1993. Pintails fell to 81,716, a 65.9 percent decline and 67.7 percent below the long-term average. American wigeon declined 49.1 percent to 32,998, 15.4 percent below the long-term average.

Blue-winged teal were a surprise, as their numbers fell by only 9.5 percent. Teal prefer seasonal and temporary wetlands just like pintails, but bluewings stayed in the state, while pintails appear to have assessed conditions and moved elsewhere. Bluewings comprise just over 1 million of the ducks counted, which is still a healthy 42.4 percent above the long-term average. And although greenwings declined 49.6 percent to 34,710, they remain 70.3 percent above the long-term average.

Key diver species are in decent shape. Redheads declined 8.3 percent to 186,313, but remain a healthy 56.5 percent above the long-term average. Lesser scaup (bluebills) fell to 151,603, a 44.9 percent decrease that places them just above the long-term average. Canvasbacks, which nest more heavily in the Canadian parklands, declined 47.5 percent to 32,686, 19.6 percent below average.

Interestingly, the seemingly unflappable gadwall population continues to boom, increasing 47.4 percent to 649,216 ducks — an incredible 109.5 percent above the long-term average.

“We have seen these oddities in the gadwall index when coming abruptly from wet conditions to rather dry conditions,” Szymanski said. “Being a late-nesting species, gadwalls that won’t breed this year are still in the process of aggregating for departure to more secure molting habitats.”

What does North Dakota’s survey mean for hunters? That’s challenging to predict, particularly given the cancellation of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Waterfowl Breeding Population and Habitat Survey. However, it’s clear that conditions in North Dakota and the broader prairie pothole region this spring are not good for strong duck production.

“Duck populations remain strong, but I don’t expect a ton of juveniles in the fall flight,” Rohwer said. “Experienced, adult birds are far tougher to decoy, which will challenge hunters — especially in Louisiana, Texas and other regions of the southern United States. Years with low duck production disproportionately affect hunter harvest in the South.”

— Delta Waterfowl


Mama always said, If you ain't got noth'in nice to say, don't say noth'in at all!

Offline savage270

  • Xtreme Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 123
  • Karma: +2/-0
I can confirm it is dry as a bone out here.  I haven't seen so many dried up potholes since the early 2000's.  The lack of water will concentrate the ducks and the hunters, so I wouldn't count on an enjoyable hunt unless you don't mind the competition.  Hopefully this is a one year thing and not the start of a drought cycle.

Online glenn57

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 47552
  • Karma: +208/-192
  • 2015 deer contest champ!!!
I can confirm it is dry as a bone out here.  I haven't seen so many dried up potholes since the early 2000's.  The lack of water will concentrate the ducks and the hunters, so I wouldn't count on an enjoyable hunt unless you don't mind the competition.  Hopefully this is a one year thing and not the start of a drought cycle.
savage, what part of ND you at??????about the only water holes i seen where the ones on 94 between fargo and bismarck when i went that way!!!!
2015 deer slayer!!!!!!!!!!

Offline savage270

  • Xtreme Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 123
  • Karma: +2/-0
I'm in Bismarck.  Lots of dried up water holes between Fargo and Bismarck as well.  Even the river is low and I got stuck on a sandbar last night with my boat.  Good thing I had my 16 year old with to jump out and push me off!

Online glenn57

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 47552
  • Karma: +208/-192
  • 2015 deer contest champ!!!
I didn't mind Bismarck. Usually  stayed at the best western seas motel in Mandan when I was out there. My boss lived south of mandan out in the boonies.  :rotflmao: has a nice spread out there.

That's drive really sucked at times during the. Winter months. :confused:
2015 deer slayer!!!!!!!!!!