Recent

Check Out Our Forum Tab!

Click On The "Forum" Tab Under The Logo For More Content!
If you are using your phone, click on the menu, then select forum. Make sure you refresh the page!

The views of the poster, may not be the views of the website of "Minnesota Outdoorsman" therefore we are not liable for what our members post, they are solely responsible for what they post. They agreed to a user agreement when signing up to MNO.

Author Topic: Proposed hunt rule changes  (Read 3453 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lee Borgersen

  • AKA "Smallmouthguide"
  • Pro-Staff
  • Master Outdoorsman
  • *
  • Posts: 15328
  • Karma: +40/-562
  • 2008-2011-2018-2019 2020 Fish Challenge Champ!
    • Lee's Lake Geneva Guide Service
            :reporter; ...... DNR NEWS - FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
         Oct. 12, 2015


Input sought on proposed hunting rule changes,
including non-toxic shot on WMAs


Small-game hunters and others can give input starting Tuesday, Oct. 13, on proposed rules that include requiring the use of non-toxic shot on wildlife management areas (WMAs) in Minnesota's farmland zone.

"The non-toxic shot rule would apply to hunters using :fudd: shotguns with shot, not to hunters using single-projectile ammunition, such as rifles or shotguns with slugs," said Jason Abraham, furbearer and regulations specialist with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. "We're trying to reduce the amount of lead deposited on public land, especially wetlands."

The non-toxic shot proposal is one of several proposed rule changes, which also include hunting game on certain refuges, use of non-toxic shot for rails and snipe statewide, and adjustments to small game possession limits.

The non-toxic shot requirement would affect hunters using shotguns to hunt wild turkey, pheasants and other small game species on WMAs in the farmland zone. Hunters currently need to use non-toxic shot for hunting waterfowl. It would not affect private land, state forest and county forest land.

The farmland zone includes the far western and southern portion of the state. The forest zone makes up the northeastern part of the state and would not be affected by this proposed rule change.

"Requiring non-toxic shot on farmland zone WMAs will reduce the amount of lead deposited in or near wetlands on public lands. These are places with heavy hunting pressure," Abraham said. "Also, federal lands already have this requirement, so our proposal makes the regulations simpler for hunters in WMAs, which are often bordered by federal land."

The proposal would allow steel or other alternatives to lead that are approved by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Other proposals
"Many of the rule changes included in this package have been discussed and supported at past public input meetings and are currently in effect as temporary rules," Abraham said. "Other proposals have not been in effect and we're encouraging hunters to learn more about the rule proposals and provide input."

Specifically, provisions being proposed in this rule package include:
•Require non-toxic shot on wildlife management areas in the farmland zone, beginning in 2018.
•Make minimum archery draw weight requirements for hunting big game and wild turkey consistent with statute by no longer requiring a draw weight of 40 pounds or more.
•During the youth deer season, allow youth to harvest a deer of either sex.
•Clarify requirements for registering and identifying bear bait stations.
•Make the possession limit for migratory waterfowl, coots, gallinules, rails and snipe consistent with federal regulations for migratory game bird species by making the possession limit three times the daily limit instead of two times the limit.
•Increase the ruffed and spruce grouse possession limit from 10 to 15.
•Increase the sharp-tailed grouse possession limit from six to nine.
• Increase the gray partridge possession limit from 10 to 15.
•Increase the cottontail rabbit and snowshoe hare possession limit from 20 to 30.
•Decrease the jack rabbit possession limit from 20 to three, with not more than one jack rabbit taken per day.
•Increase the combined gray and fox squirrel possession limit from 14 to 21.
•Modify the prairie chicken season to improve hunting opportunity by making the season nine days instead of five and moving the season to the last Saturday in September.
•Modify the opening-day shooting hours for waterfowl hunting by removing the requirement that shooting hours begin at 9 a.m. Instead, shooting hours will be one-half hour before sunrise, to sunset.
•Allow open water hunting for migratory waterfowl, coots, gallinules, rails and snipe in limited areas in the state.
•Require non-toxic shot when hunting snipe or rails.
•Increase the dove season by 10 days for consistency with federal regulations.
•Standardize common crow hunting dates by making the dates March1-31; Sept. 1 to Oct. 31, and Dec. 15 to Jan. 15.

More information about specific rules proposed and the rules process is available online at www.mndnr.gov/input/rules/wildlife.

 :coffee: ...
The DNR will accept written comments about the proposed rule changes for at least 60 days beginning Oct. 13. Comments may be submitted to DNR Wildlife, Box 20 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4020 or by email at jason.abraham@dnr.state.mn.us.
« Last Edit: October 10/13/15, 09:30:26 AM by Lee Borgersen »
Proud Member of the CWCS.
http://www.cwcs.org

Member of Walleyes For Tomorrow.
www.walleyesfortomorrow.org

              Many BWCA Reports
http://leeslakegenevaguideservice.com/boundry_%2712.htm

If you help someone when they're in trouble, they will remember you when they're in trouble again

Offline glenn57

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 47988
  • Karma: +208/-192
  • 2015 deer contest champ!!!
??????? I seen signs at some of these places years ago, public hunting areas, not sure if they where WMA's but had to use steel shot back then. there was some water in those so not sure if that was the difference or not.
2015 deer slayer!!!!!!!!!!

Offline dew2

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 2007
  • Karma: +18/-27
??????? I seen signs at some of these places years ago, public hunting areas, not sure if they where WMA's but had to use steel shot back then. there was some water in those so not sure if that was the difference or not.
The use of lead on federally controled WPA's (Waterfowl Production areas) has always been in place since steel has been required for waterfowl.The WMA's (Wildlife management area's)One can yet use lead shot for pheasants,Bunnies just all small game EXCEPT Waterfowl wihich is federally controled!!
 Just talkin to a guy who came to look at a boat.He also said the WPAs are worthless!! Damed up potholes that have no ducks because they dont have water fluctions that are close to natural low to high after rains.What a waste of $$ for ducks that dont use these special areas designed for them at high costs yearly!!!!! GRRRR
Keeping America clean and beautiful is a one mans job,Mine

Offline ray634

  • Xtreme Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 321
  • Karma: +2/-0
With the use of nontoxic shot being the norm for waterfowl and federal hunting land, why is it that we as conservation minded sportsmen do not endorse the elimination of lead bird shot? If you are shooting steel for ducks and have a trajectory formula for hitting with it, is it not a challenge to hunt upland game with a different formula? A switch to all non toxic shot would remove tons of lead from the environment, and also improve the image of sportsmen.

Offline glenn57

  • Master Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 47988
  • Karma: +208/-192
  • 2015 deer contest champ!!!
while I agree with your anology ray, the tree huggers will just move onto something else to rip sportsman that hunt and fish!!!!!
2015 deer slayer!!!!!!!!!!

Offline Onin24Eagle

  • Xtreme Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 194
  • Karma: +2/-0
What puzzles me is why they even have a crow season.  If you read the regs semi-carefully, you'll notice a sentence that basically says you can shoot a crow whenever you want to.  Page 24 states: "Crows may be taken without a license in season or at any time when they are doing or about to do damage"

Now I ask, seriously, how could a prosecutor ever prove that a dead crow wasn't "about" to do damage?

That sentence has been in the book for as long as I can remember and to this day I still can't figure out why it's still in there.  Cracks me up every time I see it.
2011 MNO Deer Hunting Challenge Champion

Offline The General

  • MNO Staff
  • Master Outdoorsman
  • *
  • Posts: 6782
  • Karma: +20/-27
  • Smackdown King
What puzzles me is why they even have a crow season.  If you read the regs semi-carefully, you'll notice a sentence that basically says you can shoot a crow whenever you want to.  Page 24 states: "Crows may be taken without a license in season or at any time when they are doing or about to do damage"

Now I ask, seriously, how could a prosecutor ever prove that a dead crow wasn't "about" to do damage?

That sentence has been in the book for as long as I can remember and to this day I still can't figure out why it's still in there.  Cracks me up every time I see it.

Give that crow a name, like Charlie the crow and you would have to prove your not guilty. 
Eastwood v. Wayne Challenge Winner 2011

The Boogie Man may check his closet for John Wayne but John Wayne checks under his bed for Clint Eastwood

Offline Onin24Eagle

  • Xtreme Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 194
  • Karma: +2/-0
"But I could see it in his eyes!  Not sure what he was up to but it wasn't good."

Seriously though I don't even know why anyone would want to shoot a crow.  The expression "eat crow" implies that it probably doesn't taste very good so I've never had any desire whatsoever to find out whether or not that's true.  If I shoot it, I'm going to eat it, with the exception of a skunk I once had to take out that was tearing up my yard.
2011 MNO Deer Hunting Challenge Champion

Offline ray634

  • Xtreme Outdoorsman
  • Posts: 321
  • Karma: +2/-0
I have never known of a crow that was not coming from or going to do damage.

On the other hand some old time army guys were on bivouac and shot a crow. It had a tag from the Washington Biological Service on it. After bivouac ended the service got a letter from the squad leader with the tag enclosed. It said "We followed your directions to wash, boil, and serv. It was a bit stringy but better than the food at the mess tent". :ustroops:

Offline The General

  • MNO Staff
  • Master Outdoorsman
  • *
  • Posts: 6782
  • Karma: +20/-27
  • Smackdown King
"But I could see it in his eyes!  Not sure what he was up to but it wasn't good."

 :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
Eastwood v. Wayne Challenge Winner 2011

The Boogie Man may check his closet for John Wayne but John Wayne checks under his bed for Clint Eastwood